Follow by Email

Sunday, 28 September 2014

In the wake of President Mahmoud Abbas address to UN, a voice of reality from amongst the vitriolic responses.

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.617951#


 Israel’s criticism of Abbas’ speech is the rhetoric of despair

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas addresses UN General Assembly

 
One Israeli newspaper at least is prepared to think the unthinkable and speak the unspeakable truth, that  Israel and the Israeli leadership are wrong.




"The government is now grasping at Abbas’ statements as if it were grasping at a life raft. But leaning on Abbas’ speech reflects nothing but fear and weak leadership. Israel has neither an answer nor a strategy for the diplomatic elements in Abbas’ address."
Haaretz: Sunday, September 28, 2014 Tishrei 4, 5775





The longer that Israel resists the inevitable establishment of a Palestinian State, based on the 1967 borders, then the more they will become isolated and marginalised around the world.


Creating a monster and making a bad situation even worse.

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/war-against-isis-its-started-but-do-we-know-what-were-doing-9760131.html


It's started, but do we know what we're doing?



David Cameron, far left, and Barack Obama, far right, vote in a United Nations Security Council meeting
Cameron and Obama at United Nations

 

A contrived "threat", manufactured, exaggerated and hysterically hyped up to suit the hidden agenda of Washington and London to attack Syria via Iraq and ultimately overthrow Bashar al-Assad.
"It's started, but do we know what we're doing?" The answer is "No. We have no idea what we are doing. We only know that al-Assad must go and this might be one avenue to help us get rid of him,"
IS or ISIL or what ever other label you may choose to put on them, is an organisation now controlling in excess of 5 million people, thousands of square miles of territory, significant infrastructure and an industrial and commercial capability which would be envied by many countries around the world. It is also an organisation which until quite recently, was armed, financed and trained by the "west" as part of their burning desire to become involved in the Syrian civil war on the side firstly of the Free Syrian Army, and then as the FSA fragmented with which ever splinter group or groups, offered the best possibilities of overthrowing the government in Damascus.However, the governments in London and Washington, were thwarted in their reprehensible ambitions, by the combination of hostile politicians and the strength of public opinion against and involvement in Syria, in their own countries. Clearly, the Americans. followed by the French and British, had to find an alternative means of achieving their ends.
Now, some three years on, the "west" has found the perfect means of gaining entry to Syria via the "back door" using Islamic State as the bogey man to justify intervention. Having created the myth of the "threat to the world" the excesses of IS (as reported and magnified by media and television) and the video's of executions, have apparently, shifted opinion, albeit reluctantly, towards some form of military option ostensibly against Islamic State. The "leaders" of the west however, have something very different in mind.




No matter what the politicians say, military experts are among the doubters.






Western involvement in the Middle East has been a catalouge of errors, missed opportunities and  disastrous interference for almost 90 years, with each intervention particularly over the past 20 years, being more and more catastrophic for the area and specifically for the civilian populations.
The west has created a Frankenstein monster and is now using it to their own short term advantage.
In reality of course, this latest involvement is only making a bad situation, infinitely worse.

Sunday, 21 September 2014

Is Gordon Brown seeking to become leader of the Labour Party, again?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/scottish-independence/scottish-referendum-secures-glorious-future-for-gb-gordon-brown-that-is-9746502.html


Vote secures glorious future for GB (Gordon Brown, that is)


Gordon Brown vows 'powers will be delivered'





Brown seems to be jockeying for some sort of position within the Labour Party, perhaps even usurping Miliband and installing himself as leader!
It does sound rather conceited of the man to assume that he, as a backbench MP, is in a position to
"make sure that these promises that have been made will be upheld." and that the " the timetable we set out will be delivered."
Ed Miliband addresses supporters in Manchester

 
He may have resigned as Leader of the Labour Party, and lost an election as Prime Minister, but he has certainly managed to hang on to the delusions of grandeur which drove him, Blair, Mandelson and Campbell in their mission to destroy the Labour Party.

Is it conceivable that Brown will be granted a second bite at the cherry?








Saturday, 20 September 2014

The triumph of bribery and fear over the reality of experience.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/scottish-referendum-results-crossparty-consensus-collapses-amid-torylabour-spat-on-the-english-question-9745125.html


The Conservative, Labour, Liberal consensus of "The Vow" which finally defeated calls for Scottish independence, has been shattered

 

 

Cameron: Further powers for Scotland will be linked to change in England.

Within hours of the results of the Scottish referendum being announced, David Cameron and Ed Miliband threw the question of further devolution of powers to Scotland, and the timetable for implementation of such changes, into chaos. The much publicised "Vow" to the Scottish people bearing the signatures of Cameron, Miliband and Clegg, was heralded days before the vote as, a solemn undertaking to begin the process of greater devolution of Scottish affairs "the day after" the Referendum vote takes place. At the time, many writers considered that "The Vow" was nothing more than a not very subtle bribe, designed to offer more devolved powers to the Scottish people in exchange for a "No" result. This inducement followed weeks of threat, intimidation and fear mongering by the vote No campaign who enlisted the support of businesses, banks, media and others to seek the retention of the union. Even foreign "leaders" were quite vocal in their support for the status quo, even though it is difficult to grasp what the matter had to do with Obama, Juncker, Merkel or the others.

Today, less than 36 hours after the vote, it is patently obvious that the prediction of prevarication, disputes and inter party squabbling, has already begun. The promised reforms, commencing the day after the referendum, have gone the way of previous promises on copious numbers of subjects (many to do with Scottish matters) made not only by previous Labour governments, but also by the ConDem coalition government during their almost five years in power. If this one element, "The Vow" has been the final consideration in anyone's decision to place their cross in the "No" box, then they have been deceived by the politicians "talent" of giving duplicity and falsehood a facade of credibility. 



prevarication, disputes and inter party squabbling

 
Within the coming months, right up to the general election in May of next year and even beyond, there will be the usual recriminations between the parties with proposals, counter proposals and even more promises in exchange for public support, rattling back and forth between the political groupings. In the meantime of course, the people of Scotland will wait for the Westminster government to finally, if ever, produce a set of proposals for "greater autonomy" for Scotland, which will bear little if any resemblance to the expectations that many people may have had on the 18th September 2014.
Cameron and some conservatives, plan to bring in "English votes for English laws" as part of wide ranging  "constitutional" changes. Miliband has proposed a "constitutional convention" that will not even present a preliminary report until sometime in Autumn of 2015. 

Between now and the next general election there will be much jockeying for position and popularity between the Westminster parties, with each bearing in mind the growing threat of UKIP and even other parties upsetting the comfortable "status quo" which they have enjoyed until now. It seems that with the bribery of "The Vow" with its vague promises now firmly established, the parties have painted themselves into a corner which they will find it difficult to extract themselves from.

Thursday, 18 September 2014

The Cameron, Clegg Miliband "Vow", is nothing more than a not very subtle bribe




Final opinion polls show undecided voters could swing the result either way



Cameron, Clegg and Miliband reveal the "Vow" and promise to protect "Barnett formula" 


For anyone in Scotland thinking about voting “No” in today’s referendum, there is a very good reason for voting with the “Yes” campaign. For anyone who thinks that the promise made by Cameron, Miliband and Clegg in respect of greater autonomy to the Scottish Parliament including powers over taxation, spending an even greater devolution, in exchange for a “No” vote, should consider what has emerged since the three “leaders” went to Scotland to unveil their “Vow” and plaster the front pages of practically every newspaper in the United Kingdom with the text.
It has become apparent that not all MP's at Westminster in the three main parties, and particularly those in the Conservative party, do not support their “leaders” in the, not very subtle bribe, that has been dangled before the eyes of the Scottish people. It seems that there is significant resistance to the prospect of Scotland gaining more per capita expenditure north of the border than people in the rest of the United Kingdom. The so called Barnett formula” has received even more criticism and is now even more likely to be scrapped.





 
In response to this criticism from MP's and others, the government is proposing that in the event that Scotland does vote “No” today, a set of proposals for the detail of the “Vow” will be drawn up and agreed between the party leaders, provided that they are able to gain the consent and support of their own MP's and their respective parties. A “White Paper” will be produced, probably in January of next year, for consultation and discussion. Following this period of time, legislation will be introduced in Parliament. Any decisions or votes on the necessary changes however, will not take place or be effected, until after the next General election in May of 2015, when in any case, there is likely to be a new government which may itself have a very different make up and viewpoint on the whole matter of greater devolution for Scotland. 
The “Vow” from the Westminster triumvirate of Cameron, Clegg and Miliband was always nothing more than a desperate, unconsidered knee jerk reaction to falling support in the polls. If it were a serious proposition, it would have been included on the ballot paper for the referendum, as originally proposed but rejected out of hand by Westminster. Moreover, even after almost 5 years of this ConDem coalition, and many years of the previous Labour government, it is only now that more devolution and greater taxation and spending powers for Scotland are hinted at.
This may be coincidence, but I think not.










Tuesday, 16 September 2014

An "emotional appeal" in front of a selected audience.

 http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/sep/15/david-cameron-emotional-plea-scotland-independence



David Cameron makes emotional plea to Scotland


David Cameron makes emotional plea




"David Cameron gives emotional speech to the Scottish people"? Well, not quite.

What he gave was another rambling speech to a selected audience of Tory party hacks, members, "Vote No" campaigners and the party faithful, who cheered and applauded at the end of practically every sentence. We have seen similar performances at Conservative party conferences over many years with the customary standing ovation at the end. The scripts of the "speeches" actually seem to contain the phrase "Pause for applause" liberally sprinkled throughout the text.
What "the Scottish people" actually got, was the potted and edited version of the good bits, which the BBC, Sky and the other political editors of the television stations chose to put into their broadcasts, and as here, what the newspaper editors chose to reproduce. Had Cameron wished to address "the Scottish people" directly, surely he would have chosen to do it on live television and radio in debate with "Vote Yes" spokespersons or at least in a proper straight into camera live presentation.
No. Cameron chose to hide behind the safety of the selected audience who would have cheered and clapped even had his speech contained only the word "Rhubarb" repeated a few thousand times.
It is rather patronising of the television and media to expect that their readers and viewers, not only in Scotland but across the United Kingdom generally, will see this speech as anything other than a last ditch attempt by a politically bankrupt politician who, seeing the writing on the wall in respect of his own premiership, is desperate to retain the Union.
I do not believe that the Scottish people, which ever camp of the "Vote Yes" or the "No thanks" argument they support, are so fickle and naive that they will be swayed one way or another, even if the political moguls of the television and media may do.   

Monday, 15 September 2014

BBC bias in Scottish referendum




BBC Scotland's referendum coverage 'institutionally biased'.


BBC Scotland protests

 
Notwithstanding yesterdays protest, which was given only passing acknowledgement on the BBC news programmes incidentally, the BBC reverts today, to its now accepted role as “The Union's Champion” and official propaganda tool for the "Vote No" campaign. About as subtle as an elephant rampaging around the shelves of Royal Doulton or Wedgwood or Royal Albert dinnerware in some exclusive department store, the BBC bounces back on its news programmes (so far) this morning, with all the “too close to call” headlines and interviews with Labour shadow ministers who, with their own agenda for retaining the Union, are given leading questions to be used as a vehicle to trot out the now well worn prophesies of doom and gloom in the event of a “Yes” vote. The BBC yesterday attempted to present a fa├žade of “impartiality” but even the spectacle of Andrew Marr spinning a coin for “first interview place” between Salmond and Darling was not convincing.


Alistair Darling, Alex Salmond, watch as Andrew Marr tosses a coin

  
With the election machines of the Westminster parties on full power, the orchestrated interventions of large corporations, banks and other vested interests and the rather bizarre contribution from the chief constable for Durham that somehow, organised international criminal gangs will seek to exploit any new border between England and an independent Scotland, may well produce a narrow, but pyrrhic, win for the No camp at the polls next Thursday. This will in no small way, be as a result of BBC “reporting” and the support for the establishment and their rather shabby negative campaigning.

Saturday, 13 September 2014

The "negative" campaigning of the "Vote No" camp sinks to new depths.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/12/scottish-referendum-icm-poll-too-close-to-call-union



"Vote No" big guns fail to halt "Yes" bandwagon.


Vote Yes campaigning.

 
Should the "Better together . Vote No" campaign win the referendum vote next Thursday, it will not be due to  winning the economic, social or prosperity arguments. It will the consequence of many people voting as a result of fear. Fear, generated by the "No" campaign, orchestrated by the Westminster political parties, because they have most to loose should the Scottish people decide to become an independent nation. 
Today, 13th September, the last weekend of campaigning, the "Vote No" camp and its allies in the television and media, together with those sections of business who fear for their own positions in an independent Scotland, have launched the most vicious, vindictive and vociferous assault on the voting yes camp ever seen before in British politics. This assault, culminates a week of intensive campaigning which started with Gordon Brown's visit to Scotland and a rather strange personal speech predominantly concerned with the NHS and the experiences of his own family. This was  followed on Wednesday, by the spectacle of Cameron, Clegg and Milliband, flying off to Scotland in a desperate attempt, to bolster the flagging No campaign. Cameron's plea that he would be heart broken should Scotland vote yes, and his appeal to the Scottish people not to break this family of nations, was linked to an appeal not to turn the referendum into another opportunity to “kick the effing Tories”. A strange choice of words for a British prime minister with Oxford education and Bullingdon club background, to choosing a public forum with the eyes of the world press and media, listening to and analysing every word.



Gordon Brown makes impassioned plea to Scots to vote no


 
 
In what many believe to be a rather bizarre promise to the Scottish people, Conservative, Labour, and Liberal Democrat, vowed to grant even more autonomy to the Scottish Parliament including powers over taxation, spending an even greater devolution. Some 18 months ago, when such an option was proposed by this Scottish National Party for inclusion on the referendum ballot paper, the proposal, was firmly rejected by the parties in Westminster. Only now, when the "No" campaign has reached the position of desperation in its attempts to retain the union, the Westminster parties have made a complete "U turn" and seem to consider that further devolution for Scotland, may be the only means of securing rejection of independence. Many observers including the Scottish public recall however, the numerous times when Westminster promises have been empty words swiftly forgotten in a very short period of time. The Westminster government rhetoric promising mountains, but delivering molehills.


Cameron, Clegg and Miliband make Scotland 'No' vote plea

 
The threats and scaremongering tactics presented by the No camp, range between the economic, with some (but not all) banks businesses and supermarket chains threatening to move the operations south of the new border, or increasing the prices of their produce on their shelves, through the sporting implications of athletes being unable to compete under the "Great Britain" banner,and culminating in a rather odd story from the chief constable for Durham that somehow, organised international criminal gangs will seek to exploit any new border between England and an independent Scotland. 
It seems that the "No" camp are sinking to the depths of desperation, in their attempts to appeal to the most emotional side of public opinion.
It is clear that those who have most to lose in the event that Scotland should vote for independence, are by inducement, threat, exaggeration and distortion of truth,seeking to restore the lead in the opinion polls that until recently indicated a comfortable win for the vote no campaign. Today's opinion polls indicate that a growing number of people have moved and are moving into the vote yes camp.The lead has been reduced over previous days to one or maybe two percentage points and the predicted result, is to close for the pollsters to call. However the bookmakers have the no camp as firm odds-on favourites. Perhaps they know something that the rest of us do not.it is clear that whatever the result next Thursday, the divisions within Scottish society on the question of an independent Scotland have created a split which may take many years if not generations, to heal. The genie of Scottish independence is out-of-the-bottle, and will not easily be put back in.








Monday, 8 September 2014

Will the negative "Vote No" campaign save the Union?

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/scottish-independence/scottish-independence-ten-days-to-save-the-united-kingdom-as-george-osborne-promises-further-devolution-after-poll-shows-shock-lead-for-yes-camp-9717329.html



Ten days to save the United Kingdom after poll shows shock lead for Yes camp


Yes or No?




The "Vote No" campaign continue with their policy of threat, intimidation and scare mongering, in an attempt to bring about a referendum result which will retain "the Union".
Even at this late stage, when all the evidence suggests that their negative campaign is having the opposite effect on peoples voting intentions, it seems that Alastair Darling and those on his side of "Britain is Better Together" are unable to provide any positive reason why the Scottish people should vote anything other than yes.
In a bizarre promise from the government, the Scots are given a firm undertaking that if they reject independence, they will be given greater autonomy from Westminster with new powers in taxation, spending and further devolution. It seems to me that the "new autonomy" for Scotland would be even greater if they vote "Yes". Another government promise that has not been fully thought through.
It may well be that the referendum will reject independence, but the result will be a very much closer outcome than the Darling camp may care to think.

Saturday, 6 September 2014

Deserting the sinking ship.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/coalition-rocked-by-bedroom-tax-revolt-9715640.html

 

Coalition is rocked by Lib Dem-Labour alliance



'Bedroom Tax' One Step Closer To Abolition After Tories Are Defeated



The closer the country gets to a general election,the more the LibDems desert the sinking ship to argue and vote against the Conservatives. Perhaps Clegg and his lemmings believe that the public have forgotten the last four and a half years, where the LibDems supported and encouraged the Tories in this ragbag coalition, to enact some of the most divisive legislation ever seen in this country since the days of Thatcher.
The increases of tuition fees, cuts to benefits across the board, Iain Duncan-Smith's "Welfare" reforms, including the so called "Bedroom tax", the privatisation of huge parts of the NHS and other industries such as Royal Mail, have been enthusiastically championed by the Liberal Democrats during their period in power. It has always been about power and the pursuit of power. In May of 2010, the Liberal Democrats, under the "leadership" of Nick Clegg, saw an opportunity to do what no Liberal or Liberal Democrat party had done for almost 80 years, and actually have seats around the cabinet table in government. Clegg, with the prospect of becoming "Deputy Prime Minister", grasped this opportunity with both hands and dragged the remaining 56 LibDem MP's with him extracting a promise of 5 cabinet posts in the new government. 

Clegg and Cameron in "happier" days. May 2010



Since then, the Conservatives have been able to rely on the 57 votes of the Liberal democrats, to push forward, at an alarming pace, their odious programme of cuts, "welfare reforms" and austerity.

 


End of the road.

 
Not so anymore it seems. With the next election only 8 months away, the Liberal Democrats seem to be placing some distance between themselves and their Conservative masters, in the hope of positioning their party to be able to retain some "balance of power" in the event of another hung parliament and then again prostitute their principles for a few cabinet places in a new coalition should one emerge.
Over the next 230 days or so, we may yet see more fissures in the coalition, as the instinct of political survival and the prospect, however small, of retaining their cabinet posts and the associated perk of office, become the driving force behind every LibDem action and vote in the Commons.
Nick Clegg and the other 56 Liberal democrat MP's, may be in for a bit of a shock come the 7th May next year, no matter how much they try to dump the Conservatives between now and then.

Friday, 5 September 2014

The death of a "comedian"

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/news/joan-rivers-dead-comedian-dies-in-new-york-aged-81-9712928.html



Joan Rivers dead: Comedian dies in New York aged 81




Joan Rivers


 

The "tributes" for this woman come pouring into the media and television from "luvies" and (some) critics saying how funny and witty she was.
However, many people, myself included will remember her only for her comment on the of the 11th August 2014, some 25 days ago, when she said
“Palestinians deserve to be dead. They started it. We now don't count who's dead. You're dead, you deserve to be dead.”
Since then the total number of Palestinians killed has risen to over 2100 of which more that 500 are children.



Joan Rivers (real name Joan Alexandra Rosenberg)
June 8, 1933 – September 4, 2014


Wednesday, 3 September 2014

Medical decisions where "How much will it cost?" is more important than "What does this patient need?"

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/sep/03/ashya-king-father-reunited-son

Parents to be reunited with critically ill five-year-old on Wednesday following their release from Spanish prison

Ashya King




The Prima Donna's of Southampton Hospital who, right up until Monday, insisted that proton beam treatment was unsuitable for Ashya and therefore they would not refer him for treatment in Prague, have this morning announced that they have changed their minds and will refer him after all. If this is the case today, it was the same two weeks ago and the "hissy fits" of the Doctors concerned and the stupidity of the Hospital, Portsmouth Council, the CPS and the police have resulted in trauma for the patient and the patients family. It is a disgrace.
It has always been about medical decisions being taken on financial cost rather than medical necessity and the "authorities" should be severely censored for their incompetent and inept handling of this whole fiasco which have cost the taxpayer far in excess of what these people were trying to save in the first place.
There may even be a case to answer at law and no doubt the lawyers will be queuing up to offer advice to the family on what redress is available to them.
Another lesson for everyone on the fallacy and stupidity of allowing committees of hospital trust members to make medical decisions where "how much will it cost" is infinitely more important than "what does this patient need".

Tuesday, 2 September 2014

The treatment of Ashya King and his family is appalling.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/sep/01/ashya-kings-parents-remanded-custody-judge-considers-extradition


Ashya King’s parents remanded in custody


The parents of brain cancer patient Ashya King
 




This case is an unnecessary trauma to an already upset family is a complete farce and a waste of our money. To persecute the parents and create stress for the remainder of the family, simply because some Doctor in Southampton Hospital had a "hissy fit" when his "authority" was challenged, is an outrage and abuse of the legal systems in both this country and in Spain where some judge requires 72 hours to make up his mind about extradition and bail and at the same time detains both parent in separate jails! Incredible !
Ashya King


 


The judge should have thrown out the request without even thinking about it.
In the meantime of course, Ashya, the 5 year old cancer patient, is in a children's hospital in Malaga where he knows nobody and does not speak Spanish.


Southampton Hospital





Basing decisions on financial cost rather than medical necessity, has always been anathema to me and from my experience of Southampton Hospital, there are some (not all, only some) Doctors in that establishment who need to have their ego's pricked very hard.
Stop faffing about and send the family off to  Prague for Ashya to obtain the treatment necessary as it is "not available in the UK"






The "Playground Bully" rounding up his "gang"

 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/01/nato-high-readiness-spearhead-force-counter-russian-threat



Nato to create high-readiness force to counter Russian threat

 

 

 

US President Obama and NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen




Complete lunacy from Anders Fogh Rasmussen, trotting out  words scripted in Washington under the guise of, "NATO says".
The playground bully of Washington wearing its NATO cape,  wanders around dragooning other people into their "gang", to intimidate Russia to bow to Uncle Sam and succumb to the Great American plan for the world.
As many (but not all unfortunately) learned from their school days in the "quad", the way to deal with the bully is to look him firmly in the eye, deliver a swift size 10 or whatever between his thighs and cause his nose to bleed profusely with either fist or forehead.
Should  Rasmussen, Obama or any other incumbent of the Whitehouse expect me to have any part, no matter how small, in any military scrap in pursuit of a dispute manufactured purely to advance their business and other interests, they will be bitterly disappointed.
From the available evidence of comments made in other outlets and media, it seems that the NATO disappointment in the fact that not many people seem prepared to play their game, will be quite extensive.