Skip to main content

Liberal Democrats Spring Conference and health service reforms.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/liberaldemocrats/9135890/Liberal-Democrats-reject-vote-on-NHS-reforms.html



Shirley Williams will probably remember the times when the Conference Arrangements Committee, aided and abetted by the Compositing Committee, sought to remove any possibility of embarrassment to the Party leadership or difficulties for the Parliamentary Party, due to Party Conference passing or even debating contentious matters. It was, in part, this gagging of dissension, coupled with a number of other Party procedures, which prompted a number of us to campaign and work for changes to the Party structure and mechanisms and bring about a more democratic party. It could have been this campaign that ultimately led to Shirley, now Baroness, Williams together with initially, three of her colleagues to reach the view that the party leadership would always have a monopoly of wisdom and party activists should follow, lemming like, in whatever direction the Parliamentary party and leadership directed, party activists and delegates at Party conference could not be trusted to reach the "right" decisions on the major issues of the time. The 4 central players at that time, recognised that the days of staged conferences, MP's jobs for life, prostitution of principle in exchange for short term popularity were over and that they should regroup under a new banner. That did not last long either and each drifted off in different directions. It now seems that the Liberal Democrats Conference has been highjacked by the ghosts of past arrangements committees. The fear that the leadership and Parliamentary party have of reasoned debate has resulted in a motion of a diametrically opposite structure to the views of many of the delegates and membership. It is the fear of criticism and the "we know what is best" mind set which has resulted in a motion which the leadership consider to be of such a structure that delegates may well make speeches against the content, but in order to show unity, they will find it difficult to vote against. Consequently, the motion will be passed, the leadership will have won (albeit a Pyrrhic victory), and Shirley (now Baroness)  Williams, will no doubt smile and reflect on how it all might have been different. The loser's in this sorry tale are of course the rank and file members and supporters of the Liberal Democrats, the conference delegates, the credibility of the party conference idea and of course the British people. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is this finally the end for Prime Minister Theresa May?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/voice-mirror-theresa-best-forgotten-14196202?fbclid=IwAR3qST8BsuNfhVba-NzuryiySuzohxUxGz5fwvD7WKDJ5DPcCURt_gbLa0k


Theresa May is best forgotten as she finally falls on sword.

Theresa May falls on her sword says the Mirror and the Telegraph but subject to certain qualifications, which could see her still hanging around if "Her Deal" is ruled out by the speaker,or is again defeated in a vote. Just goes to show that when it comes to falling on a sword, she couldn't even get that right. 



The EU knows it, so do our own MPs – Theresa May is finished

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/brexit/the-eu-knows-it-so-do-our-own-mps-%E2%80%93-theresa-may-is-finished/ar-BBV5r2L

PM in complete denial losing her grip on power and on reality.The Prime Minister Theresa May, is now in complete denial of the reality in which she finds herself. In much the same way as a child threatens to take its ball and go home, the Prime Minister again writes to all MP's, threatening that the THIRD "Meaningful Vote", may not be put before the commons next week unless there is substantial support from MP's to pass it. In order to reinforce this threat, the Prime Minister  repeats her 4 points from the meeting with the other EU leaders in Brussels. 1. We can revoke Article 50 - but that would be to betray the result of the referendum.2. We can leave with no deal on 12 April - but the House has previously said this is not something it will support.3. If it appears that there is not sufficient support to bring the deal back next week, or the House re…

The "antisemitism" argument is just an excuse.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/01/david-blunkett-calls-for-corbyn-project-rethink
Labour needs 'seismic change' or party will fall into decline 

Watching the newspaper previews on television last night, one of the reviewers made a comment which was certainly missed, probably by design, by his co previewer and the presenter and I should think by many of the viewers at home. The story under review was the Telegraph front page coverage of Baron Blunkett's intervention in the on going "anti semitism" row within the Labour party. The reviewer commented, as many of us have remarked on in the past, that all the criticism leveled at the party leadership on this issue, has originated from that section commonly described as the Blairite wing of the Labour party. Blunkett argues "Either Jeremy Corbyn can lead a party into gradual decline and irrelevance, or demonstrate that he can lead a party fit for Government", much in the same vein as oth…