Skip to main content

Planning to normalise relationships but sticking to the myths.




 http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/magazine/it%E2%80%99s-not-the-us-embargo-that-keeps-cuba-poor-it%E2%80%99s-the-brothers-castro/ar-BBgUYpV?ocid=U142DHP


It’s not the US embargo that keeps Cuba poor, it’s the brothers Castro



Celebrations in Havana for US and Cuba plans to restore ties.

 
The headline from this MSN, introduces an article which, ostensibly, is to report on the American initiative to "normalise" the relationship between Havana and Washington.The article of course does nothing of the sort, and soon sinks to the depth of yet another criticism to add to the list of criticisms leveled at Cuba and Fidel Castro in particular, over the last 56 years.The piece of journalistic nonsense, goes the way of all the rest and seeks to explain away the Cuban revolution as just another failed exercise in the "Marxist" experiment of economy management and ignores, as is often the case with American versions of history, the "Why" and the "How". By way of a brief attempt to put the record straight, the following comments may remind us of the reality rather than the myth reported as "fact" in the MSN article.

Fidel Castro

Fulgencio Batista








       






 
Since the American backed dictator, gangster and corrupt despot Fulgencio Batista was removed from office as a result of the 1958 revolution, the Cuban people have lost the mafia controlled casino's, brothels, clip joint bars, drugs industry and extreme illiteracy, abject poverty and high infant mortality rates so common on the island. They have gained schools, hospitals, university education, greater life expectation, an improved economy (in comparison to Batista's corrupt system) and a relatively higher standard of living.
The gangsters, drug barons and most other criminals  with their links to organised crime and the CIA in the United States, fled to Miami and other parts of Florida to set up, with American backing and assistance, the DRF (Democratic Revolutionary Front), Brigade 2506 and other tin pot organisations with the objective of overthrowing the new Castro regime in Cuba and restoring the dominance of organised crime in Havana. It was these organisations, with CIA finance, arms and training which embarked on the abortive Bay of Pigs invasion fiasco in 1961, a plan about which J. F. Kennedy, the new American President knew nothing until after the event.
 


Bay of Pigs.





Since then however, successive American governments have maintained a policy of embargo and trade restrictions against the Cuban government which to a great extent have been ineffectual in many sectors of the Cuban economy. With perhaps the exception of the "Cuban missile crisis" of 1962, Cuba has maintained a slow but steady growth in the standards of living of the Cuban people (when compared to the days of Batista). There is compelling evidence that Fidel Castro transformed the country from a corrupt and  criminal dictatorship into a progressive and (relatively) successful nation, despite the actions and opposition of the United States. In Cuban society, Fidel Castro remains popular and is viewed as "saint" rather than "sinner", no matter how hard Washington and the criminal exiles in Miami may try to convince the world otherwise.
The MSN "journalists" should at least try to give the impression of being objective with their stories rather than trotting out the tired old cliches of discredited American propaganda.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe