Skip to main content

The law has no place in industrial relations.

Justice secretary wins injunction to stop prison officers' industrial action
Image result for prison officers strike injunction

A major criticism that many have against previous Labour governments, is the complete failure to address injustices to working people in this country brought about by the grossly unfair anti Trade Union legislation introduced by Conservative governments during the 1980's and 1990's. Additional restrictions introduced by the Labour governments of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, have only compounded an already unjust assortment of legislation, which effectively removes or severely restricts the ability of working people to seek improvements to pay, working conditions or safety for users.
These restrictions are reminiscent of the Combination Acts of 1799 and 1800 which criminalised working people from banding together, outlawed Trade Union and collective bargaining and proscribed the right to strike. Sympathy for the plight of the workers brought repeal of the acts in 1824 and the Combinations of Workmen Act 1825 was passed, which allowed labour unions but severely restricted their activity.
Over the past decades, since the 1980's, we have witnessed successive governments enthusiasm for resorting to law to prevent working people from pursuing an industrial dispute. The courts have granted injunctions and or other legal restrictions to prevent strikes or other legitimate activities, which has often been seen as bias towards government or employer involved in the dispute. In the past, injunctions have been granted against Firemen, hospital workers, railway personnel teachers and numerous other groups of workers, involved in legitimate Trade Union activities within an industrial dispute. Some groups of workers have even had their right to strike removed from their conditions of employment.

Related image
Justice Secretary: Liz Truss
Yesterday, (28th February), the latest intervention by the courts resulted from the application by justice secretary, Liz Truss, who won a high court injunction blocking an escalating programme of industrial action by prison officers over pay and conditions. It has often been said that the law has no place in industrial relations. Interventions of this kind achieve nothing apart from prolonging the dispute and preventing the industrial action being suspended but at the cost of souring the employee/employer relationship often for months or even years into the future.
The next Labour government must pass the necessary legislation to repeal those Acts passed since 1980, which prevent working people from exercising their democratic right to take part in Union activates at whatever ever level.
Labour must establish the return to Free Collective Bargaining, stop the intervention of judges and the law in industrial relations, and rid the statute books of this country of laws which are irrelevant antiquities, the residue of legislation from the 19th and 20th Century.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe