Skip to main content

The media should know that trying to conceal the fact will not make it go away.


The belief that if you ignore something it is either not happening or will soon go away is a dangerous and futile exercise.



It is becoming increasingly apparent that the media and television are intent on concealing the level of attendance at the public rallies for each of the candidates in the Labour Party leadership contest.
This is in marked contrast to the reporting of last years contest, when the cameras were all too keen on photographing queue's of people clamouring to attend Jeremy Corbyn's meetings and even climbing through windows to get in when the halls were full, as was invariably the case. No doubt much of the coverage then was more about novelty value than any actual interest because the media and television considered that Corbyn would not win and that the public interest in the man would soon wear off. Perhaps they even had their headlines prepared pouring scorn on Jeremy Corbyn's challenge and the "misguided" public interest in his meetings. How wrong they were and how stunned they must have been when Corbyn swept into office on the first ballot, with 60% of the votes.


Corbyn in Leeds
Owen in Salford









Corbyn in Salford



Owen in Hull









Corbyn in Hull
Owen in Salford















Less than 12 months later, they are determined not to make the same miscalculation again.The media and television have almost completely ignored the public rallies and only the Social Media have carried any reports on the numbers attending Owen Smith and Jeremy Corbyn rallies. Perhaps the disparity in numbers seen thus far almost vindicates the silence of the mainstream media who would not be too keen to report how the support for Corbyn has if anything, increased from last year and how their preferred candidate Owen Smith, has been left speaking to just a few dozen supporters or perhaps just curious people, forming the audience.
What the media would have even greater difficulty in explaining or putting a spin on the noticeable absence of any of the Parliamentary Labour Party "Big Guns" Kinnock, Benn, Umnna, Cooper, Hunt, Watson and the others, at any of the Owen Smith rallies offering their support and endorsement of "their candidate". It was after all these plotters who hatched this coup in the first place, triggering this leadership election distraction. It seems that they can find no one from the 172 conspirators with enough backbone to stand with Smith and justify their actions and promote Smith as an alternative leader.

As this leadership contest will be a long drawn out process, perhaps they are waiting for the Jeremy Corbyn campaign to falter before they throw their wight behind the challenger. They may have to wait a very long time and during this period of self imposed absence, their already tarnished mantle of credibility, collapses to dust around them. No one will ever trust them again. 








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe