Skip to main content

50 minutes of cliche and repetition.




Gordon Brown urges Labour not to be party of protest by electing Corbyn



Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown during his speech at the Royal Festival Hall


Gordon Brown arrived at the Royal Festival Hall in London and after the usual introductions to the specially invited audience of party members and journalists, spent the next 50 minutes perambulating backwards and forwards across the platform wearing at least half an inch off the soles of his shoes and saying precisely nothing. That is, nothing that Blair, Straw, Clarke, Campbell, Kinnock, Johnson, Polly Toynbee and others including it is now revealed Mandellson have not said already.
Gordon Brown, the man who droned on about being “credible, radical, sustainable and electable” and (after selling off £billions of UK gold reserves) “economically credible”.
We would do well to remember that Brown is a man who has never won an election (apart from those in his own constituency) in his political life. The man who never stood in an election for the position of leader of the Labour party and yet became its leader, a man who never stood before the British people as the person to become Prime Minister and yet was “anointed” to the post in 2007 (only to be defeated at a General election less than 3 years later).
The same man who, while pacing around the meeting room, giving a speech heavy with “thinly veiled warnings”, revealed the true nature of his Labour party and paradoxically why thousand of people are flocking to join the party and why there is growing support amongst the public for Jeremy Corbyn.
Gordon Brown reiterated what others, including the other 3 candidates, Polly Toynbee and other journalists have argued over recent years that power is necessary in order to implement programmes and consequently, as Toynbee put it (4th August 2015 and repeated by Alan Johnson the following day) “you have to win power to get anywhere at all. Once in power, with the levers of persuasion, you can take people further than you dare tread in opposition”. This proposition, so popular with the right in the Parliamentary Labour party and elements of the wider party, sections of the press and other media press, emphatically states that the Labour party the holds the opinion that it is acceptable and even desirable, to lie, cheat and deceive the people of this country with hypocritical promises of anything and everything in exchange for their votes in a General election. It is this attitude that has soured the perception of politics and has given credibility to the public view that “They are all the same once they get elected”. 



Jeremy Corbyn stands for making a clean break with Tory policies,


 

Jeremy Corbyn has changed all that by providing a new emphasis, where policies and principle are more important than personalities and sound bites, where truth and honesty are more important than hypocrisy and duplicity and where there is a vision that there is a real alternative to the “Westminster establishment” and the status quo. It is this that has attracted thousands of people into the Corbyn camp and it is this that the right fear. Bringing out the failed “old guard Grandees” of the party seems to have had little if any effect and if anything has hardened the determination to take the party back into the control of its members rather than the Westminster clique.
Gordon Brown spent 50 minutes yesterday saying nothing other than to repeat the tired old clichés of a section of the Labour party which will resort to any tactic in order to retain its grip on power.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe