Skip to main content

Elections must be about policy and openness not personalities and hypocrisy.



Free to dream, I’d be left of Jeremy Corbyn. But we can’t gamble the future on him. says Polly Toynbee.


Polly Toynbee



 
Polly Toynbee comes down firmly on the side of Yvette Cooper. During her justification for reaching this decision, paradoxically sprinkled with praise for Corbyn and many of his programmes, Toynbee, perhaps inadvertently, reveals why the Jeremy Corbyn campaign is striking such a high note with party members, both new and old, and perhaps more importantly, with the public.
One of the criticisms in the media and on television, frequently levelled against Corbyn and those who support him is that Labour could not win an election under his leadership, and consequently those voting in the ballot should support one of the other candidates and as Toynbee would prefer, Yvette Cooper. In support of this advice, Toynbee uses the now, hackneyed phrase you have to win power to get anywhere at all. Once in power, with the levers of persuasion, you can take people further than you dare tread in opposition”. 





Liz Kendall,Yvette Cooper and Andy Burnham 





 
The words which epitomize everything that is wrong the Labour party now and over the last decades, and why Labour party membership has been declining steadily for many years. These are the words, now committed to print by an eminent journalist in a reputable newspaper, which emphatically states that the Labour party the holds the belief that it is acceptable to lie, cheat and deceive the people of this country with hypocritical promises of anything and everything in exchange for their votes in a General election. After that of course, the new Labour government could forget any promise, pledge or undertaking given before polling day, and pursue its own agenda, regardless of public opinion. It is this belief that has soured the concept of politics and has given credibility to the public perception that “They are all the same once they get elected”.
It is this rejection of the “electability” argument that has propelled Jeremy Corbyn into the position of leading the contest for leadership of the party. He has consistently argued during this campaign and during his time as a backbench MP, that elections must be about policy not personalities, about truth and honesty, about rejection of the “status quo” and the bankrupt culture of the “Westminster bubble”. It is these values, ambitions and qualities that are striking such a chord with Labour party members who have remained with the party for many years and the thousands of new members who are joining or rejoining the party. 




Jeremy Corbyn



 
The choice facing those voting in the leadership election is a simple one. A choice between the “status quo” of tired old “Tory-Lite policies wrapped up with what ever hypocrisy may be necessary in order to win a General election at any cost. If that is your preference, you may select, Burnham, Kendall or join Polly Toynbee in the Cooper camp.
However should you feel that policy is more important than personality, or that truth and openness are qualities to be encouraged rather than ridiculed, Jeremy Corbyn is the only candidate meeting these values.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe