Skip to main content

Miliband major backs Kendall and is prophesying a one party Tory UK, should Labour elect Corbyn

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/17/david-miliband-electing-jeremy-corbyn-risks-one-party-tory-state


David Miliband: electing Jeremy Corbyn risks creating one-party Tory state

 

David Miliband





Liz Kendall is backed by David Miliband
























Miliband major endorses Kendal and predicts a dark future of a "one party state" should Jeremy Corbyn become leader of the Labour party. Still smarting from his rejection in the previous Labour leadership election, Miliband major seeks the return of a Labour government under the leadership of Kendal (or even Cooper or Burnham if Kendal fails to win the September vote) to bring about changes in British society.
However, the Miliband major, Kendal, Cooper and Burnham view of the Untied Kingdom is rather different from the views of thousands of other people.
In the years since Thatcher, how much of the Tory anti Trade Union legislation passed by her government, has the Labour party repealed? How many of the restrictions placed on councils and housing associations have been removed to allow more houses to be built? How much of the "privatisation" of our industries, services and utilities has been rolled back? How much of the NHS has been taken away from the private companies who put profit before patients? Apart (perhaps) from minimum wage legislation, what have the Labour governments of "the right" under Blair and then Brown actually done for the ordinary people or the sick or the disabled or welfare claimants? Burnham, Cooper and Kendal offer more of the same, tired old status quo of the Blair/Brown years, but this time they are adding their own "austerity" package to the mixture. They even abstained on the recent Welfare vote in the Commons. The Blair/Brown administrations did nothing over 13 years and now the Burnham or Cooper or Kendal proposals promise to return this country to those wilderness years, should they (a) become leader of the party and (b) become Prime Minister. Provided of course that they can get over the cat fighting and squabbling between themselves which becomes more bitter and acrimonious by the day. On the other hand, Jeremy Corbyn proposes a programme of reform and policies for the 21st century and for the benefit of all sectors of the people of this country. I know who I am voting for.


 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe