Skip to main content

The writing on the wall?




 British democracy in terminal decline.


 

Firstly, let us dispel the myth that Britain is a democracy. It is not and never has been. In Britain, we are ruled by an elected dictatorship, which we have the "democratic right" to change every 5 years or so. The Country is in fact governed by the Prime Minister aided and abetted by "the cabinet" or as in the case of Tony Blair, a very few close "advisers". This little cabal, usually meet in secret, take decisions and create policy, and then tell the rest of their respective parliamentary party what the policy is and rely on this "lobby fodder" to march through the Government lobbies in pursuit of Party unity. Only rarely is this "unity" challenged when Government rebels find some proposal so obnoxious that they publicly object and indicate that they will at least abstain, or horror of horrors, they will vote against the Government. At this time the "Government whips" get to work, threatening a member's career in the house, or promising a promotion, or some other seedy inducement or threat to the individual MP, and usually but not thankfully always, the objections melt away and the Government "survives" the vote. There are fortunately a few members in the House who manage to retain a degree of honour and principal. It is against this background that the "long-term terminal decline" of British politics should be viewed.
This decline has been evident over many years but only in recent years has this decline accelerated at such a rate. Probably the biggest factor in this is the ever increasing availability and use of social networking and its ability to spread comment, news and debate to a wider and wider audience. Tweeters are now everywhere commenting and spreading news more quickly than newspapers or television news could ever possibly compete with. Political events are instantly analysed, commented on and passed on and the activities of politicians are closely scrutinised. With this relatively new public awareness, there comes the realisation that currently all political parties are basically the same with the "rush to the centre ground" of the late 1980's now producing the effect that there is no real choice when voting and all options lead to the same result. The voting system in any case leads to the anomaly of more than 60% of those bothering to vote, choose nit to vote for the party which wins under the "First past the post" election method. Under these circumstances, it is difficult to see any reversal of the decline, particularly as Governments become even more unrepresentative of the people in the country. Perhaps a complete replacement of the current political system is called for, in my view it is certainly necessary..

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...