Skip to main content

When it comes to austerity, there are no differences between them.






 There is no choice between the parties. They both seek to retain the "status quo".


Chancellor George Osborne



 
This country is lost in a quagmire of right centre politics, dominated by the Conservative and Labour parties preaching much the same policies as each other, but with marginally different emphases. The Liberal democrats are in the same dreamland, but flit around trying to find an opportunistic perch, upon which to alight and barter their few seats in the house of Commons in exchange for a few cabinet posts should either of the other parties fail to achieve an overall majority under our present antiquated and blatantly unfair voting system.
All the while, the people of this nation remain locked into a situation where they have little control of their everyday environment and even less prospect of bringing about any real change in the foreseeable future. On Wednesday of this week, (26th June 2013) the Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, announced this governments latest round of cuts and austerity, wrapped up in the Government Spending Review enthusiastically encouraged and endorsed on the ConDem coalition benches. The sight of Iain Duncan-Smith and Jeremy Hunt grinning and laughing during Osborne's speech and Michael Gove being patted on the shoulder as if he had brought about some earth shattering advancement of human achievement, was nauseous. There can be no cause for levity when announcements are being made which will ensure that living standards will be cut even further for those least able to protect themselves against the consequences.


The Opposition?

  
Those waiting for some sort of spirited response or challenge from the opposition benches, defending working people, the disabled, the unemployed or benefit claimants generally, were sadly disappointed. The Labour party, through Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls, could only trot out the usual cliché’s of “the government has failed” or “the Chancellor offering more of the same” or “no support for families” etc etc. The crowning insult, is that Labour have already conceded their intention to keep the government spending plans for 2015 and after, and will not reverse the cuts in welfare and other austerity measures already announced by the Tories. In other words, Labour will continue with the austerity programme, but with a few minor and insignificant tweaks, should they win the next election.
This emphatically demonstrates that there is no discernible difference between the mainstream political parties and their plans to impose years of cuts, falling living standards and hardship on a growing number of people in this country. There is no doubt that if austerity has not come knocking on your door yet, it will soon do so, forcing you to acknowledge the reality of the social and economic reality of present day living. The political grouping of Labour, Tory, Libdems and a few other's, welded together in the centre ground would have us believe that there is no alternative to continued austerity, regardless of how such measures are packaged or which party completes the packaging.
This is a fallacious proposition seeking only to ensure that the “status quo” of alternating periods of government between Labour and Conservative is maintained. In this deceit, the parties are aided and abetted by elements of the media and press, patronising the public with their bias for one side or other, and their often not very well hidden agenda's for greater press “freedoms”.
There is an alternative to never ending austerity. There is an alternative to the centre right morass of political opportunism and self interests. The alternative is not UKIP, who may soon become part of the problem. The realignment of the left of the political spectrum is taking place now and will soon become the rallying point for the peoples of the United Kingdom.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe