A callous outrage? Yashika Bhageerathi is deported.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/yashika-bhageerathi-teenager-who-fled-her-native-mauritius-because-of-extremely-dangerous-relative-flown-out-of-britain-minutes-after-legal-plea-fails-9234077.html

Yashika Bhageerathi flown out of Britain minutes after legal plea fails

Yashika Bhageerathi

We allow paedophiles, rapists, murderers, "terrorists" and other assorted criminals,(and often their families), specifically those who are foreign nationals, to remain in this country on it seems an indefinite timescale. The reasons for this anomaly are usually based on some nebulous concept of "human rights" or that their cats would be traumatised if they were deported. Additionally, we allow many of these evildoers the freedom to wander in and out almost at will, from some open prison or other penal establishment (if of course, they are actually in the prison system rather than on bail, remand or some other indefinite form of restriction)
In this case, we have a 19year old girl, who has been in the United Kingdom for some two years, is at school studying for "A" level qualifications, has committed no criminal offence and yet is deemed to be some sort of threat and is deported. This is in spite of the undertaking from her family, that they would all leave the UK following the examinations in May. That is next month, less than 50 DAYS from now!
The decision to deport this girl,not her family, just the girl is a callous and disgraceful outrage perpetrated and endorsed by Theresa May, James Brokenshire, and David Cameron.

Theresa May and David Cameron.

James Brokenshire

These three individuals, as those ultimately responsible for this apathetic decision, should feel shame this morning for failing to intervene in this process and delay the deportation,(if deportation is in fact the right course),if only until later in the year.
In pursuit of their desire to appear tough on enforcing the "rules", they have succeeded only in exposing themselves as obdurate, haughty idiots having little, if any, understanding of the significance of their actions.

Comments

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria. This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California. Unless they are actually doing some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...

Agenda 2019

Search This Blog