Skip to main content

Another vague promise to scratch the surface of a national scandal.






Labour plan to build 150,000 new homes.


 
plan to build 150,000 homes by 2020


 

150,000. No where near enough.
The shortage of housing in this country has been an outrage for decades. Families and young people, face the prospect of years living in overcrowded or inadequate conditions as builders and speculators grow rich on providing a few homes at inflated prices while receiving government (tax payers) cash incentives, for building a small number of "low cost" housing. In the rented sector, social housing is practically non existent and in the private market, rental prices are on an ever increasing spiral. In conditions where people have no alternatives for a home, they have no option but to pay the inflated price.
Political parties have made capital from this situation over many years by dangling to many desperate people, the prospect of "more homes", in exchange for their votes. The historical reality has always been subsequent disappointment but with the promise repeated next time around. Today, it is the Labour Party coming out with its promise to spend in order to build 150,000 homes by 2020 with the emphasis being on "first time buyers". No mention of those who are not and will never be "buyers" of any kind, first time or otherwise.







For far too long, politicians have paid lip service to solving the housing problem without any real commitment to resolving the issue. The provision of a few catchy sound bites and "impressive monetary figures" may deceive a few voters but will do nothing to provide homes.
What this country desperately demands is the provision of a minimum of 300,000 new homes of which 60% will be "social housing" provided by either local councils or housing societies or a mixture of both, and of the remainder the provision of a substantial number of "low cost" homes for those who choose to purchase.
The party to which I once belonged, sounds little different from Conservative or Liberal Democrat when it comes to housing. They will all make the right noises in general with a few minor variations in detail and all leaning towards “buyers”, but in the final analysis will do little to tackle the problem.
Vague “promises” without substance or intent.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...
Post a Comment
Read more