Skip to main content

The culmination of a coup that was hatched last year.











Labour MPs prepare for leadership contest after Corbyn loses confidence vote





Of the 172 MP's who voted in favour of the "No confidence" in Jeremy Corbyn motion in yesterdays (28th June) vote, not all were from the "Blairite" rump of our party. Some were from the centre and a few from what is described as the left. This fact has been seized upon by the television and media, with the same eagerness as a starving man would grasp a crust of bread. The coverage of the result of the "No confidence" motion, on BBC Television news and on the Sky News programme, was clearly bent towards their long standing drive to remove Jeremy Corbyn from the Labour leadership and to further this ambition, our screens were filled with a stream of anti Corbyn figures, including David Blunkett, Alistair Campbell, Jack Straw, Chris Bryant and a few others, all repeating the well scripted line that "Jeremy is a decent man and will hopefully do the right thing for the party and resign". In a departure from the scripted text however, Alastair Campbell had the outrageous conceit to state that "Jeremy Corbyn is destroying the Labour party". Coming from the person who, along with Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson, created the grotesque "New Labour" to further their own ambitions, abandoning ordinary people to the "markets" and business interests and thereby destroying everything that the Labour party had once stood for, the remark was itself crass and hypocritical. However, in order to achieve at least a veneer of balance, both channels had a sprinkling of new shadow cabinet members and Trade Union people to support Corbyn and the party leadership, albeit that the interviewer tried their best to promote the "Corbyn should go shouldn't he" media line.


































A common link between those MP's supporting the no confidence motion, goes back even before the leadership election of last year. The simple fact is that none of the 172 actually wanted Jeremy Corbyn to be the leader in any case, their support in the election being spread between Andy Burnham and Yvette Cooper. Corbyn was the "token" candidate of the Left. The candidate on the ballot paper to show that the PLP was offering a balanced list, where in fact it was no more than a cynical ploy to maintain their own comfortable "status quo" of a centre right cabal. The mounting fear during the campaign that Corbyn might in fact win, turned to stunned dis belief when on the first ballot, Corbyn received 60% of the vote. The realisation that they now had a leader that only a minority of the PLP actually wanted, persuaded many of them to join the growing coup plot which had been hatched even before the election result was declared. The "Anyone but Corbyn" or the "Stop Corbyn" campaigns in addition to the unofficial smear and sniping from backbench MP's encouraged and orchestrated by a hostile media, grew in intensity fuelled by Dankzuc, Hunt, Johnson, Brown, Kinnock, Mann and others, with some openly stating that in the event that Jeremy Corbyn became leader of the Labour party, they would launch a coup to remove him from the leadership "within days".

















Yesterdays vote of no confidence, was the culmination of that coup. The expectation amongst the conspirators, was that following the result, Jeremy Corbyn would succumb to the intimidation of the PLP, (something that the PLP are very good at, intimidating anyone who dares to oppose their collective view on any subject) and resign immediately, leaving them free to have their "coronation" of which ever candidate they could agree on, but without the pressure of having a leadership election which they feared. It is strange how the democratic process can instil such dread in people who claim to be democrats, supporting the will of the electorate. In this case, they have again miscalculated the mood and the reality of the main players in this drama. Firstly, their arch enemy (the reality, no matter what these two faced hypocrites may say publicly) has refused to resign. Corbyn has invoked the party rules stating that to remove an incumbent leader, there must be a leadership challenge from a candidate with at least 50 nominations from MP's or MEP's. Secondly, the coup organisers seemed to have expected a large proportion of Corbyn supporters in the party membership, to have softened their stance, a proposition that the conspirators are telling media at every opportunity. Again they are wrong and must be rather worried at the support on social media, in the press and at rallies around the country in support of Corbyn and highly critical of the coup and its organisers. It also seems that a number of the 172 MP's are now worried that they could face de-selection by their Constituency parties.

It is now inevitable that a leadership election will be held on a time-scale drawn up by the National Executive Committee of the Labour party. The problem for the PLP is that should the Labour party members re elect Jeremy Corbyn as party leader, the coup organisers will be back in the same position as they were last week. The question for them is where do they go from there?






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...