Skip to main content

Hypocrisy reigns supreme in Westminster.


Boris Johnson calls for demonstrations outside Russian embassy 




Image result for boris johnson



The hypocrisy of conservative politicians, especially now of Boris Johnson, is breathtaking.

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said he would “like to see demonstrations outside the Russian embassy” he also asks 'Where is the Stop the War coalition?"
It seems that demonstrations and those who take part in them are only acceptable when the object of the demo is one which the Tory party agree with and actually promote (an event so rare as to be almost a myth). At all other times, demonstrations are just politically motivated bandwagons (as per Oliver Letwin) organised by extremists and left wing militants (as per any conservative politician you may choose to ask) and are always attended by "Rent a Mob".






Image result for demonstrations in london




Tories were not interested, and were quick to condemn demonstrations by millions of people against the Poll Tax, or the preparations for the Iraq wars, or the invasion of Afghanistan, or the intervention in Libya, or the increases in University fees or a hundred and one other demo's which opposed government policies.
"Rent a Mob" only has respectability when the government of the day seeks to shroud their shabby hypocrisy with a veneer of credibility.




Image result for andrew mitchell



While on the subject of Conservative Party hypocrisy, consider for a moment, the latest hypocrite to crawl out of the woodwork of conservative central office. I refer of course to Andrew Mitchell, MP for Sutton Coldfield who has thrown his weight behind Boris Johnson and his calls for prosecutions and anti Russian demonstrations. However, the hypocrisy pours out of Mitchell when he vigorously supports Saudi Arabia and others, bombing civilians in Yemen, using British manufactured and supplied weapons, in their barbaric targeting of "rebels" in Sana'a and other "rebel" held areas.
It is clearly obvious that it is a war crime to target and bomb "rebels" when such "rebels" are attacked by Russian or Syrian forces, and yet it is perfectly acceptable to attack "rebels" when they are the as defined by the United States, United Kingdom Saudi Arabia etc as "bad rebels".

That is a fundamental problem when becoming engaged in another countries civil war. When so many different warring factions are involved, as in Syria, it is impossible to know which faction or factions to support. In Yemen supporting the Saudi Arabian led coalition with arms and logistical support is an indefensible policy which is blatantly more to do with making the arms manufactures and dealers even richer, that with resolving the conflict.


The fighting goes on, the humanitarian crisis grows worse as civilians are killed and hypocrisy reigns supreme in Westminster.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe...

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...