Skip to main content

The hypocrisy of the Western Powers.



Syria airstrikes: US targets airfield in first direct military action against Assad


Image result for Syria airstrikes: US targets airfield in first direct military action against Assad


Since early 2013, the American government closely followed by the United Kingdom government and with the French governments padding along at their heels like some well rained and obedient poodle, have been desperately seeking some justification, no matter how tenuous, to become involved in the Syrian Civil war. In this odious quest, they have been enthusiastically encouraged and supported by a media and television machine, frantically baying for the removal of Bashar al Assad and the Damascus government.



Image result for Syria airstrikes: US targets airfield in first direct military action against Assad


Hidden amongst the rhetoric and disinformation regarding civil rights abuses, humanitarian assistance, chemical weapon programmes and the rest, all spewed out to advocate Western involvement, lies the real reasoning behind the enthusiasm for military intervention. The first and foremost reason was and still remains, regime change in Syria aimed at replacing the Damascus government and Bashar al Assad, with a regime closer to and more reliant on Western, or more accurately American, goods, services, technical and military support.

Image result for Syria airstrikes: US targets airfield in first direct military action against Assad


Unfortunately for the west, the numerous "rebel groups" are divided into hundreds of factions, some of which the Western Powers will openly support and others which might be described as the "bad rebels" such as ISIS and Al Qaeda who "the West" are covertly assisting and all of whom seem to be involved in a war between themselves. A truly complex situation which is almost insoluble.
With the news overnight (6th/7th April 2017) of the American Cruise missile strike against a Syrian government airfield at al-Shayrat near Homs, "in retaliation" for the alleged chemical weapons attack upon civilians in Khan Sheikhoun in the rebel held Idlib province, a significant change of policy appears to have been embarked upon in Washington. The strike took place even as the United Nations security Council were considering a resolution calling for a full investigation and report into the reports from Khan Sheikhoun and clearly demonstrates that the American government has lost patience with its position and constant frustration and now seeks to unilaterally impose its will in Syria. Events over the next few days and weeks, will reveal to what extent the region and the world has moved towards a wider conflict or whether the attack of last night was just a short sharp shock.
"The West" are quick to exert military or other measures to inflict their collective desires in Syria, Iraq or in other locations around the region, and yet those same powers and the media who support them, are woefully silent in respect of atrocities committed by allies of the West in Yemen or Palestine or Somalia to name but three.
The Western powers and their media champions, would do well to note the following:

"Hypocrite":

the behaviour of people who do things that they tell other people not to do: 
behaviour that does not agree with what someone claims to believe or feel 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...