Skip to main content

Labour promises on the NHS, Social Care, Housing and Education are a winning formula.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2017/may/11/general-election-2017-labour-leaked-manifesto-politics-live


The draft Manifesto contains landmark promises on the NHS, social care, education and housing


Image result for We must campaign together to create a society for the many not the the few.

Today's papers and this morning television (and last nights and this mornings television newspaper previews), are full of coverage of the "leaked" Labour party draft manifesto for the coming general election.The coverage ranges from the hysterically hostile "Jeremy Corbyn will take Britain back to the 1970,s"  in the Telegraph, and "The NEW longest suicide note" as the less than original offering in the Mail, through to the mildly supportive "Labour party's plan to nationalise mail, rail and energy firms" from the Guardian to "The 43-page draft contains landmark promises on the NHS, social care, education and housing", from the Mirror. Sky Television News and BBC New 24, vied for the "honour" of being the most hostile and biased television channel,and as usual dead-heating for the most biased spot but with Sky News streets ahead on the abuse and hostility front, devoting almost 30 minutes to castigating the leaked draft manifesto and rubbishing Jeremy Corbyn, by name, more often than Theresa May uses the "Strong and stable government" cliche.
The one common theme, particularly in the more hostile coverage, is the usual questioning of the ability of the Labour party to finance it programme. For as long as I can remember, certainly since I first became involved in politics, the manifesto has always been subjected to the same comments and criticisms from the conservatives and those hostile to the Labour party, particularly from the media and television where over recent years, especially since Jeremy Corbyn was elected as leader, the level of criticism has become vehement.
In this election campaign, the conservatives and their supporters in the media, are becoming desperate in their quest to stem the growing support for Labour and its policies for the many and not just a few. In this desperation, their reliance on the age old cliche of  "the costings do not add up" is indicative of a party and a political philosophy which has nothing to offer the people of this country other than a rehashed more of the same old programme. The conservatives and media are now totally reliant on smear and demeaning of the Labour party leadership and distortion, misrepresentation and lies directed at the Labour party programme.



Image result for john mcdonnell manifesto leak


The fact is that the policies are fully funded and costed as John McDonnell has tried repeatedly to explain in the face of hostile interruptions from many of the television presenters who were clearly briefed to give McDonnell as uncomfortable a ride as possible The Labour party programme will be funded by changes to the level of Corporation tax, changes to the rates of income tax for those earning over £80,000 per year, a new  rate of private health insurance tax and yes a modest level of borrowing, a proposal which has been criticised by media and a conservative government which incidentally over the course of the last 7 years, has itself increased government borrowing by more than £50 billion year on year and increased the National debt to record levels of over £1.5 trillion.
It is conspicuously obvious that the conservatives and their media supporters have no positive arguments or counter proposals to offer as an alternative to the Labour party programme, other than the tired old cliche of "the costings do not add up". A party which has run out of ideas and arguments retreats to the shelter of negative campaigning as a refuge from scrutiny and criticism.



Related image


The Labour policies which the conservatives and the media so fear, have a great deal of support amongst the British people, some businesses and and many charity organisations.
These popular measures include an end to the privatisation of our NHS and a reversal in those sectors already privatised, an expansion of social and welfare care, abolition of cuts to school budgets and an end to tuition fees, an expansion of British infrastructure, a house building programme to produce 1 million new homes over the course of a parliament, taking back into public ownership the Royal Mail and the  energy companies and railways who have been ripping off the people of this country for far too long. These policies are known to be popular with the public, and the conservatives have no answer.
The result of this election is not a foregone conclusion and Theresa May, the conservative party and the media and television are well aware of this fact. The daily assault on the Labour party and its leadership, becomes more hysterical with each passing hour. We may expect that over the course of the remaining 27 days the level of venom from the conservative machine will become even more vitriolic as they realise that their days in government are numbered.
We in the Labour party must remain firm in our resolve to continue putting forward our policies and explain the way in which those policies are funded. It is an election which we must fight on our terms and on our agenda and we must not be diverted into sterile debate with those who seek to avoid the issues while concentrating on personalities.   We must continue to press for a fair and just society where no groups or individuals are excluded and left behind. We have the policies and we have a strong leadership.
Now, we must campaign together to create a society for the many not the the few. 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...