Skip to main content

May 2nd 2013 was a bad day for the three traditional parties.

Nigel Farage forces Ukip into the political mainstream with a stunning haul of seats in the local elections





David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband have held talks over the Leveson proposals for press reform




There is nothing as frustrating and sad, as watching and listening to politicians burying their heads in the sand in the hope that an unpleasant situation will, somehow, pass them by. Yesterday, the two main news stations on television were in fierce competition parading politicians from the three traditional parties, in front of the camera to explain and in most cases dismiss, how it was that a political party which has no base in Westminster, has no well oiled organisation and was, until yesterday at least, derided as “clowns” and “fruitcakes”, could come from nowhere to claim 25% of the vote and gain more than 140 seats to hold 147 at the end of the day. Admittedly, the overall turnout was quite low at less than 40%, but never the less, 25% of the votes cast is a significant number of people. No matter what Gove, Hughes, Chuka Umunna, Cable, Harman, Cameron, Clegg or any of the others may say to spin out reality, yesterday was a bad day for the three traditional parties.


 


 Even more worryingly, they were as one when resorting to the usual meaningless clichés of having to listen to the people, explain their policies, re connect with the public, ensure that lessons are learned, and all the other tired old phrases which always see daylight following parliamentary by-elections or local council elections.
Paradoxically of course each of the party spokespersons are able to explain away, (at least to their own satisfaction) how the result was, on balance, quite a good result for their own party. Taking first prize in this charade was Simon Hughes, who was able to convince himself, if not his audience, that the Liberal Democrat vote held up quite well, with the party holding on to many of their seats in the west Country and coming second in many others. The fact that the Liberal Democrats lost over 130 seats across the country was conveniently passed over.
No matter what personal political views anyone may have, the fact remains that UKIP had a very good day and have struck a chord with significant numbers of people around the country. UKIP councillors now have seats in many of the County Halls in the United Kingdom, as well as seats in the European parliament. Next year there are European elections, with a UK general election in 2015. Yesterday's result was an indication of many things. Some elements of “Protest” votes quite probably, but not sufficient in itself to create such a dramatic shift in voter preference. To dismiss this 25% poll showing as a “flash in the pan” and to “confidently predict that this will never happen again” as one Tory commentator come politician did in a live interview on BBC, is taking wishful thinking to an absurd level. Never say never as someone once remarked.
There has been a realignment on the right of British politics and the politicians of the traditional parties would be well advised to recognise it. With the present “First past the post” voting system in this country, UKIP would have little chance of turning their percentage share of the votes into parliamentary seats in Westminster, albeit that the Liberal Democrat have consistently had less than 25% vote share since 1983, but have still managed to convert that into seats in the House of Commons.
However, between now and 7 May 2015 (except in the event of a two-thirds majority of MPs voting for an early election), it is not beyond the realms of possibility that support for “the 4th Party” will increase to such an extent as to ensure that the make up of the Commons will be very different from that which we see today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...