Skip to main content

The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was not the only reason.

 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/28/sarajevo-franz-ferdinand-first-world-war?guni=Keyword:news-grid%20main-1%20Main%20trailblock:Editable%20trailblock%20-%20news:Position4




Sarajevo: city commemorates end to 'a century of conflict', but divisions still run deep



Archduke and his wife  a few minutes before the assassination





The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie, did not start the First World war. The war  would have taken place sooner or later, even if Princip had not fired the fatal bullets. In fact the assassination may not have taken place at all had the driver taken the correct route and had not been ordered to stop and reverse right opposite to where Princip was standing, following the first failed attempt by the other conspirators earlier that day. Chance hangs on such slender threads.




Gavrilo Princip






The prime cause of the Great War was the Austro-Hungarian Empire and its determination to attack Serbia, which had dominated political thought in Vienna for some time.The actual assassination was used merely as another reason for Austrian aggression, as can be evidenced by the text of the Austrian ultimatum to Belgrade on the 23rd July 1914. The alliance between Serbia and Russia was ignored by Vienna, as they had received an assurance that in the event of Russian mobilisation, Germany would stand with Austria. Europe at that time, was a patchwork of alliances and treaties which contributed greatly to the complications and misconceptions of the First World war. Ironically, Great Britain was not part of any formal alliance at that time and only entered the war following the German invasion of Belgium which Britain had promised to defend under the Treaty of London of 1839.
Treaties, Alliances, Agreements were all part of a complex mixture of reasons for the start of World War 1, coupled with the growing economic and militaristic power of Germany. To say that the, almost, chance assassination of  Archduke Franz Ferdinand started the Great war, over simplifies a very intricate series of events and relationships.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...