Skip to main content

Frances O'Grady says Labour should get on with being an effective opposition.


TUC leader says Labour is failing to act as effective opposition

Image result for frances o'grady tuc
TUC General Secretary Frances O'Grady

Frances O'Grady could well be right."“It is important that Labour does not just focus on members and MPs but actually unites and gets on with being an effective opposition and map out a route to victory".
However, O'Grady and others who repeat this "selective" view of reality fail, either by accident or more probably design, to mention even in passing, the reasons for the party being " focused on internal rows". Even before the leadership election of last year, there were those elements within the Parliamentary Labour Party (as well as in the media), openly stating that in the event that Jeremy Corbyn became leader of the Labour party, they would launch a coup to remove him from the leadership "within days". From that time, there has been an almost daily dose of PLP "briefings" and media speculation with the clear intent of undermining and discrediting the leadership, which has become even more intense since the orchestrated coup of June this year, failed to achieve their objective of compelling the resignation of Jeremy Corbyn as leader.
Under these circumstances, what are the people who disagree with the objectives of the coup organisers and the constant barrage of negative press and anti Labour party leadership briefings from the Parliamentary Labour Party expected to do?
There are those who would dearly love to see the people resisting to coup, to just acquiesce and accept that the democratic decision taken by some 251,400 (59.5%) can be simply rejected and overturned by 172 people who did not want that result. The majority of Labour party members did not wish to see another leadership election, less than 9 months after the election of September last year. Members have repeatedly argued that another election would be divisive within the party and have consistently called for party unity to focus on opposing the conservative government and attacking their policies on the NHS, working peoples rights, welfare, civil liberties, Europe and all the other measures which are destroying peoples lives and society in this country.
It is the 172 of the Parliamentary Party and those who support them who are determined to perpetuate this division and turmoil within the Labour party, presumably until those who are resisting them, surrender unconditionally to their subterfuge, intimidation, threat and bullying and meekly accept whatever terms the 172 dictate. However, surrender is not likely to happen anytime soon, resulting in the distinct probability that the divisions will continue to be the focus of media attention.
It is still not too late for unity to be restored in the party ranks. The 172 can still even now, accept the democratic decision of the party membership and unite behind the leadership. Jeremy Corbyn and others, have frequently appealed for a coming together of personalities but this has been ignored so far.
Perhaps Frances O'Grady should direct her comments towards those who's personal agenda's seek a different Labour party to the one which, together with the Trade Unions and affiliated organisations, strives to fight the excesses of business and corporate interests and conservative government, rather than members of their own party.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe