Skip to main content

Gerald Coyne accuses the Unite general secretary of meddling too much in Westminster politics,







Unite leadership challenger Gerard Coyne says Len McCluskey has put Labour infighting above members’ needs




Image result for len mccluskey Gerard Coyne Unite regional secretary
Gerald Coyne

Image result for len mccluskey
Len McCluskey












Gerald Coyne, another of the Quasi intellectuals so much in favour with the Guardian and other "centrist" media who will grasp at any opportunity, now matter how small or how unclear such opportunity may be, in their incessant campaign to remove Jeremy Corbyn from the leadership of the Labour party. In his bid to replace Len McCluskey as General Secretary of "Unite", Coyne accuses the Unite general secretary of meddling too much in Westminster politics, a comment which in itself is reason enough for members to re elect McCluskey for another term. Had the TUC generally and other specific Trade Union leaders in particular, spent more time over the last 18 months "meddling" in Westminster politics, then the Labour party may have been spared the trauma of the second leadership election and the internecine warfare which still simmers in the back rooms of the Commons and in the proprietors editorial offices in many sections of the media.




Image result for jeremy corbyn len mccluskey

Coyne argues that Unite together with presumably other Unions, are "neglecting the crucial issues facing working people". Where in fact, it is Coyne and others of his persuasion, who are "neglecting" the issues facing working people and thereby their own members with their obsession to remove Corbyn. It will come as no surprise to many, that Coyne has the support of "Labour First" the splinter group with the avowed intention of replacing the current Labour party leadership with one more in tune with their own political position, and a number of Labour members of the Parliamentary Party, who have been openly hostile to Corbyn and to Len McCluskey for his continued support for the party leadership. This overriding objective of changing the leader, does not sit well with the notion of "neglecting the crucial issues facing working people".
The essential truth is that the Labour party in Westminster was founded by the Trade Union Movement with the objective to "to establish a voice for working people within parliament" .
It is therefore crucial that Unions generally do "meddle" in Westminster politics, to address and campaign on "the crucial issues facing working people", for that is the role for which the Labour party was created and the role upon which all Labour party MP's should be directing their energies, rather than on the self indulgent distraction of the leadership question.




Related image





These are some of the reasons why I shall be casting my vote for Len McCluskey in the ballot taking place in March/April next year and urge other brothers and sisters to support McCluskey also.
We must not allow the continuing self interests of some elements within the Union movement and the party, to detract from what our only objective must be. We must address the "crucial issues facing working people" in the workplace and in Westminster for that is the reason for the Trade Union movement and for the creation of the Labour party.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe