Skip to main content

More than 350 workers are being sacked because they would not agree to a new contract that meant less pay.


Care workers sacked because they won't agree to pay cut in council company's 'Project Fear' 



Image result for Care workers sacked because they won't agree to pay cut in council company's 'Project Fear', union claims
Council care staff face sack - because they won't sign a contract for less pay 

How times have changed and not for the better.
Some years ago, the thought of an employer being able to sack workers and then in the next second, re employing them on reduced pay and worse conditions, would have been dismissed as a fantasy existing only in the darkest recesses in the mind of the most unscrupulous employer, or in the dream world of some extreme right wing conservative politicians and their supporters, who would also welcome a return to sending children up into chimneys.
Now, since the days of Thatcher and her compulsion to drive working people into submission and be thankful that they actually have a job, with her anti trade union legislation and recourse to the courts of law and the forces of the police, the balance has been grossly changed. Today it is common for this practice to be used as an alternative to normal industrial relations negotiations, whereby an employer can legally say "I will negotiate, but this is what I shall do. If you do not agree, I will terminate your employment and give you a new contract, implementing the changes that I am demanding. Take it or leave it."
The most glaring example in recent months, of this outrageous abuse of the employers position, is the long running Junior Doctors dispute with Jeremy Hunt and the conservative government. There have been numerous examples across other industries not least of all in transport and local authorities and now comes this latest case where more than 350 workers are being sacked by the county–council owned social care company, because they would not agree to a new contract that meant less pay. It is an outrage and it is wrong.

Related image

The reason why that, in the first part of this 21st Century, we are still facing the abuses of rogue employers and the unscrupulous politicians who enthusiastically support them, is the failure of successive Labour party governments to repeal or even amend the anti trade union legislation passed during the 1980's and early 1990's. In fact, the government of Tony Blair, 1997 to 2007 and to a lesser extent the government of Gordon Brown 2007 to 2010, consolidated and expanded legislation placing even more restrictions and available sanctions on working people in this country.

Image result for blair and brown
Did nothing to repeal anti working people lgislation
It is not, nor should it ever be the role of the Labour party, either by design or omission, to perpetuate or introduce, policies and legislation, which are detrimental to or not in the best interests of those people that we seek to represent.
It must be a clear objective and task of the next Labour government and a policy which must be included in our manifesto as a firm commitment, to repeal all anti Trade Union legislation passed into law since 1980, to restore the principle of "Free Collective bargaining" in the workplace, remove the punitive restrictions on the rights to peacefully picket, restore the right to demonstrate and protest against exploitation, restore the rights to withdraw labour and to end the restrictions on the right of working people to organise and join Trade Unions.
Image result for labour party manifesto

Working people in this country have in many cases, been reduced to the levels of slave labour with Zero hour contracts, imposed short time working, less than minimum wage payments and often dangerous working condition. We in the Labour party and Trade Union movement, must lead the way in the struggle to restore decent working conditions and practices and bring back balance to the current grossly distorted worker to employer relationship.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe