Skip to main content

BBC debate: Rivals attack Theresa May over absence

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-40105324

The prime minister is not here tonight. She can’t be bothered.



Image result for Theresa May  f****d up campaign mirror
A woman in hiding
One week from today (Thursday June 1st) this country will go to the polls to elect a government for the next five years.The result of that poll is even far more reaching than that, as the government on the morning of June 9th will determine the direction and shape of this country for decades to come. It is then almost unbeleivable, that the Prime Minister, who called the general election when she had no need to do so, other than the irrestable temptation to cynically capitalise on an apparent 40% lead in the polls, the Prime Minister who had repeatedly said that there would not be a general election until 2020, should make such a shamles "U turn" and call an election with just 7 weeks notice.
Almost unbelievable that Theresa May should decline at least two invitations to attend televised debates with the leaders of the other parties, and to put her case to the country through millions of television viewers. Only when we consider the appalling mess that the Prime Minister has created during the course of this election campaign can we begin to understand her reluctance to debate the issues with other leaders.It was the Prime Ministers intemtion to limit the focus of the campaign to Brexit and the conservatives have no policy options to put forward, other than a few half baked uncosted ideas on "Green papers" the details of which will be  "worked out after polling day".

“If you were going to write what not to do in a campaign, running it on ‘strong and stable’ and changing your mind on everything would be it.” “I’m f****d off. People say on the doorstep: “She’s going after pensioners, she doesn’t know what she’s doing and doesn’t answer questions.”“It’s totally shattered the confidence of the parliamentary party. Colleagues up and down the country are just f***** off. She said she wasn’t going to call a general election, and they’ve totally f****d it up.

Not my words, but those of a clearly dis illusioned Conservative MP who for obvious reasons insists on remaining anonymous. This morning, Theresa May held a press conference, her most favoured form of communication with people, where she or her minders can control the content and the questions to suit their own comfort areas. I lost count of the number of times she used the words me, or I, or my, as she waded through a prepared script distinctly slanted towards Brexit and only mentioning in passing any areas of policy, but not missing the chance to throw in a few personal snipes at Jeremy  Corbyn. What was interesting however, was her use on a number of occasions, of the phrase, "My government will ensure etc etc", or "My government will" do this or that as if she were practising for another role. If HM was watching this broadcast, she need not be too worried as Theesa May would not be able to handle the "mixing with people" that this other role would require.  


Image result for BBC debate: Rivals attack Theresa May over absence

The Prime Minister dumped the task of debating a failed government campaign stategy and policy (if there is one), on the shoulders of Amber Rudd who did reasonably well considering her own personal circumstances, though she too was floundering on a number of occasions during the debate, having to resort to personal attacks towards Corbyn and the now well worn conservative cliche of "the magic money tree" before falling into the hole of inviting the audience to "judge the government on its record", which drew laughter and inaudible comments.
The remaing members of the panel, Tim Farron, Caroline Lucas, Leanne Wood, Paul Nuttall and Angus Robertson, often descended into exchages all shouting over each other, behaving as if the evening debate was a relay of the weekly Questions to the Prime Minister in the House of Commons.


Image result for BBC debate: Rivals attack Theresa May over absence

At the end of the debate, each candidte gave a closing statement and apart from Amber 
Rudd, mentioned the abscence of the Prime Minister. Caroline Lucas caught the mood with
her comment in response to the final audience question about leadership. Lucas remarked 

"Well, I think the first rule of leadership is to show up.You don’t call a general election and 
say it’s the most important election in her lifetime, and then not even be bothered to debate the issues at stake.”

A reply which registered with the audience in the hall and probably with the voters around 
the country as well.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...