A sordid cover up not a vendetta.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/downing-street-aware-damian-green-claims-kate-maltby-sexual-harassment-a8123651.html

'No 10 knew' of Damian Green claims in 2016.

How far into the corridors of power, does the stench of cover up and chicanery in this sordid complicity actually stretch? The campaign of smear, threat and vilification against two former police officers is being orchestrated by certain sections of the media and by those Green allies, determined to deflect attention and create smokescreens to hide the reality that Green repeatedly lied to police, media and colleagues in respect of his knowledge and active part in the downloading of pornographic material onto his office computers. It is not the police who are the villain's in this story. It is Green and those seeking to protect him.

We now learn that the circumstances which initiated the investigation into Greens behaviour were rather more than a "fleeting touch" of Kate Maltby's knee and sending her suggestive text messages. In a BBC interview yesterday (21st December) Maltby reveals that Green made "improper advances" over a period of time prior to his appointment as First Secretary of State. More worryingly, it seems that Downing Street were aware of Green's behaviour prior to his appointment, after Maltby spoke to a very senior and long-serving aide of Theresa May and others reporting these incidents.

Downing Street official sources are repeatedly denying that they or the Prime Minister knew anything about the allegations, but it is difficult to accept that prior to or since Green's appointment as "de facto" Deputy Prime Minister, the government were completely in the dark as to his actions. It seems that the "establishment" are even now laying the groundwork to discredit Maltby and her revelations as to who knew what and when.

This story, the "establishment" lies and subsequent cover up now spreading into Number 10, has some way to run before all is exposed. 

Comments

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria. This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California. Unless they are actually doing some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...

Agenda 2019

Search This Blog