Skip to main content

The taxpayer picks up the bill for PFI contracts.


Taxpayers face £199bn bill over PFI projects.

Image result for carillion

As predicted by some of us back in the days when the Blair government first expanded a policy launched by the Major government creating the PFI (private finance initiative) schemes, as a way to use private sector investment in order to deliver public sector infrastructure and/or services,the prospect of such close associations between government and private industry was always a bad idea, not good for taxpayers or society. Today's report by the National Audit Office reveals that there is "little evidence that government investment in more than 700 existing public-private projects has delivered financial benefits"


Related image


The report goes on to state that "The cost of privately financing public projects can be 40% higher than relying solely upon government money". The result of this, is that over the past 25 years but particularly particularly since 2010, the whole PFI concept has spiraled out of control and with cost the taxpayer more than £200 billion to contractors.This is without the effects of the Corrilion collapse which will cost the taxpayers £ billions for many years to come, as the full implications of the collapse on business and subcontractors, reliant on Carillion and the thousands of workers employed in the associated industries become revealed.

Image result for pfi contracts


The government continued to pump out contracts to Carillion, even when it was abundantly clear that the company was in trouble. This in itself was gross negligence and incompetence and can only be seen as a lamentable attempt to bailout or prop up the company. The report from the National Audit Office today,is yet another condemnation of the philosophy which has driven government thinking in respect of private company involvement in social projects for the last 10 years.
This scheme is a disaster for society and for the country and must be scrapped immediately.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...