Skip to main content

Fantasy offered as fact.

“Inside the Titanic. An ambitious factual drama that reveals moment by moment exactly how the Titanic sank, telling the untold stories of the engineers and stokers who battled the icy water.”
If television companies plan to show programmes under the description of factual drama, they should at least ensure that the factual content of the presentation are accurate. Last nights (22nd March 2012) offering over 2 hours on Channel 5, was full of fabrication and historical inaccuracies from start to finish.
Titanic carried a total of 20 lifeboats not 16 as stated in the programme. It was the Board of Trade regulations which stated that vessels over 10,000 tons must carry that number (together with rafts and floats for 75% of the lifeboats) which had nothing to do with the number of water tight compartments. The orders given by First Officer Murdoch (after the lookouts sighted the iceberg) were “Hard a'starboard”, “Full a'stern” “Close water tight doors” “Hard a'port”. Captain Smith ordered “All stop” when he came onto the bridge shortly after the collision.
Carpathia first received Titanic's distress call at 11 minutes past midnight and arrived at the scene at 04:00. Not the 10 hours away as the narrator suggested. The portrayal of the main characters of the disaster, Captain Smith, Bruce Ismay, and not least of all Thomas Andrews was awful. As the leader of the Guarantee Group (and designer of the ship) Andrews was involved in the damage assesement at a very early stage. This point was completely glossed over.
The list of glaring errors and omissions is almost endless. If programme makers seek to tell a true story they should at least get their facts right. All in all, 2 hours of fabricated rubbish.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...