Skip to main content

American "advice" on European membership.

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/obama-administration-warns-britain-to-stay-in-the-european-union-8444789.html


Obama administration warns Britain to stay in the European Union



Philip H. Gordon: Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs


Britain risks damaging its relationship with America and being sidelined in the international community if it leaves the European Union, the Obama administration publicly warned today.


Americans, or at least a good number of Americans, seem to have a great problem in keeping their noses out of other peoples affairs. This time it is the turn of us, "the Brits", to come under the spotlight and to receive the guidance, advice, or perhaps more accurately the "warning"  instructions, from the great American busybody to dismiss any thoughts or suggestions of having a referendum on the question of European membership, and to remain within the European Union. Now personally, I believe that continued membership of Europe would be more and more disastrous over time and that we should determine our continued relationship with those across the Channel by the means of a referendum. I would argue that point of view with anyone in this country be they politician, public, press or in fact anyone else that may have a point of view different to mine. However, the thought of "outsiders", particularly Americans, (who's record of offering "advice" to all and sundry outside their own shores is, at best, unfortunate) offering the instruction that not only should we remain in the European Union, but we should also forget expressing a view on membership, is particularly galling. The American people have recently had an election to choose the person who they want to be their President for the next four years. During that time of electioneering, right up to the date of polling, I nor many others in this country, have had the temerity to instruct the American people who they should or should not, vote for as their President. Apart perhaps from a few private comments to friends or others about the candidates public remarks or attitudes , it would be quite wrong of those outside to try to influence the outcome. Many American politicians and State department sycophants, evidently do not share this attitude and consider it their duty as the self appointed "guardians of the world" to throw in their opinions and  platitudes on any matter. History is littered with the results of American "advice" and the consequences of their interventionist policies. It may be a vain hope, but the State department, the President for the time being and the countless other interfering American meddlers, really should keep their grubby little fingers out of other peoples pies and their noses out of others people business.
















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe...

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...