Skip to main content

The arrogance and contempt of the Energy Companies.

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/all-in-it-together-energy-chiefs-feel-heat-from-mps-8911466.html


Representatives from Big Six accused of behaving like a 'chorus line acting in concert' as they attempt to justify recent price hikes





Energy company bosses at Commons select Committee



 
The energy companies treat their customers with contempt because nobody is prepared, or able, to stop them. Consumers are unable to take on the companies because energy is a basic need and no matter how often people "switch" suppliers, the end result is ever increasing domestic charges. The political parties are unwilling to legislate to prevent such excesses and in many cases are more likely to actively support the energy companies position in the name of "free markets and competition".
The notion of "self regulation" in the supply of energy would be as effective in this market as it has been in any of the other areas where the fox has been put in charge of the chicken coop. The privatisation of energy supply to the consumer and generation for the wholesale market has been a complete disaster for the customer and the country. The absurdity of allowing Energy companies to be both generator and supplier has crated a situation where the companies, through another part of their own organisations can sell themselves  energy and generate huge profits, and then claim that wholesale prices have increased using that as a justification for hiking the price to consumers and thereby generate even more profits. Thus, both parts of the organisation make substantial profit at the expense of the consumer. This situation is complete lunacy and has no moral, ethical or social justification. It merely serves as a device to exploit customers and produce obscene levels of profit for companies who in many case are actually based outside the United Kingdom.  
Until such time as politicians recognise (or perhaps concede) that energy is a basic human need, the supply of which is too important to be left to the vagaries of private companies where the profit motive far outweighs the social benefits and that no amount of tinkering at the margins will make one iota of difference to the exploitation of consumers and the manipulation of the markets, nothing will change. The demand for a radical solution to this problem is compelling. Either the energy companies must be controlled by new, effective and legally enforceable legislation, or they must be returned to public ownership. All that is needed is for the politicians to acquire the resolve to do what is necessary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...