Skip to main content

Proposing an institutionalised policy of cover up is not "turning a new page"

 http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/nhs-leaders-call-for-end-to-waves-of-criticism-of-health-service-9032207.html


NHS leaders call for end to waves of criticism of health service

 



Two medical staff wheel a bed along a hospital corridor
10 NHS groups have called for a "new page to be turned" in 2014


 
I would be the first to admit that in many areas the NHS provides a first class service and provides care and treatment for many of its patients. (I refuse to call anyone in need of medical attention "customers", as seems to be the jargon so popular with politicians and parts of NHS management).
However, over recent years, and at an accelerating rate, standards have been declining as more and more medical staff become disillusioned with the constant "restructuring" of trusts, recruitment of more management strata at the expense of front line medical personnel and the resulting increase in A&E waiting times, cancelled appointments, declining standards in wards and frustration of medical staff.
It is for these reasons that I had to read this article in today's "Independent" twice in order to grasp what the British Medical Association, NHS Confederation, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Nursing and other groups,were actually calling for in their "open letter" to the Guardian.
It seems that these eminent medical professionals, are  actually promoting the argument, that any criticisms of the NHS should be stiffed, that failings and bad practice should be recognised but glossed over, and that any blame of organisation, individuals or systems should be brushed under the carpet with the objective of "turning a new page",and  leaving "fear, blame, recrimination and demoralisation behind, to forward with energy and optimism".
This is outrageous and dangerous nonsense which seeks to gain credibility hiding behind the facade of supposedly intelligent people from the medical bodies. The public who are reliant on this service and incidentally fund the NHS to the tune of £ billions annually, have a fundamental right  to be informed of mis management, bad practice, negligence or any of the other failings of the service or of the systems or people within it, regardless of the degree of failing. Only in this way can the public have any knowledge on how the service is being operated and whether they can retain any confidence in the standard of treatment they or their families will receive.
The medical bodies involved with the authorship of this "open letter" have, either by accident or design, done a grave disservice to the health service and should immediately reconsider the wording and content of this not very thinly disguised attempt to justify an institutionalised policy of cover up and whitewash as being in the "best interests" of the NHS.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe...

The writing on the wall

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-government-zero-hour-contract-ban-latest-a9257281.html?fbclid=IwAR0OW6qhoVnO9MVH-E9ruKFLnL_V3NQ5PMpYEkGGHEXskJxkAsrr2UJjRIs Two-thirds of voters want  Boris Johnson ‘s government to ban zero-hours contracts, a poll has found. There will be many people over the coming months and years who will tell the "pollsters" that something should be done about the homeless, or the costs of electric, gas and water, or about the costs of public transport, or the failing (and privatised) NHS, or the excessive profits and tax avoidance of large corporations. etc. To all those I say, that if you did not vote Labour then you have only yourselves to blame and you must bear the consequences of your actions. Johnson a nd his sycophant cronies have been given a blank cheque to do as they please and sell off vast portions of the British economy to the Americans, (the takeover of British defence giant Cobham by a US private equi...

Greed and envy are good says Boris Johnson.

  http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/embrace-culture-of-greed-says-boris-johnson-8968276.html Embrace culture of greed, says Boris Johnson Boris Johnson.  "I stress – I don't believe that economic equality is possible; indeed some measure of inequality is essential for the spirit of envy and keeping up with the Joneses that is, like greed, a valuable spur to economic activity." Johnson delivering the annual Margaret Thatcher lecture at the Centre for Policy Studies think-tank, Wednesday 27th November 2013 Boris Johnson seeks to emulate Thatcher. He appeals to the evil side of the "nasty" party, for a society where greed is good, where selfishness is encouraged, where division amongst people by envy and status is championed as a proper objective and where the excesses of business and government are regarded as appropriate and right for the advancement of the few at the expense of the many. Johnson is an evil man with evil intent...