Skip to main content

Proposing an institutionalised policy of cover up is not "turning a new page"

 http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/nhs-leaders-call-for-end-to-waves-of-criticism-of-health-service-9032207.html


NHS leaders call for end to waves of criticism of health service

 



Two medical staff wheel a bed along a hospital corridor
10 NHS groups have called for a "new page to be turned" in 2014


 
I would be the first to admit that in many areas the NHS provides a first class service and provides care and treatment for many of its patients. (I refuse to call anyone in need of medical attention "customers", as seems to be the jargon so popular with politicians and parts of NHS management).
However, over recent years, and at an accelerating rate, standards have been declining as more and more medical staff become disillusioned with the constant "restructuring" of trusts, recruitment of more management strata at the expense of front line medical personnel and the resulting increase in A&E waiting times, cancelled appointments, declining standards in wards and frustration of medical staff.
It is for these reasons that I had to read this article in today's "Independent" twice in order to grasp what the British Medical Association, NHS Confederation, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Nursing and other groups,were actually calling for in their "open letter" to the Guardian.
It seems that these eminent medical professionals, are  actually promoting the argument, that any criticisms of the NHS should be stiffed, that failings and bad practice should be recognised but glossed over, and that any blame of organisation, individuals or systems should be brushed under the carpet with the objective of "turning a new page",and  leaving "fear, blame, recrimination and demoralisation behind, to forward with energy and optimism".
This is outrageous and dangerous nonsense which seeks to gain credibility hiding behind the facade of supposedly intelligent people from the medical bodies. The public who are reliant on this service and incidentally fund the NHS to the tune of £ billions annually, have a fundamental right  to be informed of mis management, bad practice, negligence or any of the other failings of the service or of the systems or people within it, regardless of the degree of failing. Only in this way can the public have any knowledge on how the service is being operated and whether they can retain any confidence in the standard of treatment they or their families will receive.
The medical bodies involved with the authorship of this "open letter" have, either by accident or design, done a grave disservice to the health service and should immediately reconsider the wording and content of this not very thinly disguised attempt to justify an institutionalised policy of cover up and whitewash as being in the "best interests" of the NHS.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe