Skip to main content

Censorship at the Independent, Guardian and Huffington Post

Censorship at the Independent, Guardian and Huffington Post (to name but three) is working overtime at the moment predominately it seems on the subject of the Israeli air strikes and naval bombardment of Gaza and the killing of civilians. Any article, comment or observation even remotely critical of the Israeli government in Tel Aviv, is removed swiftly and without any reason or explanation to the author. The posts just disappear, rather like Palestinians in Hebron or Nablus or Ramalah or a hundred other towns in the occupied territories.
This morning I have had personal experience of the Independent, Guardian and Huffington Post censors. I posted the text of, “The "collective guilty conscience" of the governments in the western world.” ( http://new-agenda2012.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/european.html ), in the comments section of an item published on their pages. In the case of the Independent, the item was in response to an article by their Yasmin Alibhai Brown. The paper accepted the comment and then, within a few minutes it had been removed. A few more tries and then blocked from even commenting. I did however manage to place a link to the Blog, but on checking now, the whole commenting facility has been removed from the article.
The Guardian was a bit slow in removing my post from their article. A number of readers had already managed to “recommend” my post (8 in fact and with 5 replies) over a period of some 10 minutes, but by then the censors had been alerted and the comment, together with the recommendations and replies simply vanished.
Huffington Post took the text, held it for some 5 minutes before deciding that it was too critical of Israel and the western leaders to be allowed onto their pages.
This experience demonstrate a point raised in the text. Israel can do no wrong and any criticism of its government or its actions will not be acceptable. As I state in the text, “Any criticism of Israeli expansion, the collective punishment of populations, the continuing occupation of Arab lands, the flagrant disregard of United Nations resolutions, even those that manage to get past the American veto, is essentially ignored by the west and treated as more anti Semitic outpourings by the "Jew haters".
If I had used obscene language, or misrepresented fact, or had libelled some individual, or had committed some other cardinal sin, I could understand a post being deleted. However, to have a post removed without explanation or reason by some Israeli, or Israeli sympathising censor on these online papers is really unacceptable.
I will continue to criticise Israeli aggression in Gaza and the ongoing occupation of Palestine, in spite of the Israeli sympathisers in the offices of online newspaper or anywhere else.
However, it is a great shame that this account of censorship will only be seen by a relatively small readership.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...