Skip to main content

The changing borders in the Middle East.

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iraq-crisis-isiss-declaration-of-an-islamic-state-is-a-threat-to-the-entire-middle-east-claims-pm-nouri-almaliki-9580085.html


 

Isis's declaration of an Islamic state is a threat to the entire Middle East, claims PM Nouri al-Maliki


 


Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki

 
The ruling factions of existing Middle East countries, supported by the Americans and "the West", are struggling desperately to retain their position and influence in the region. Ironically, by supporting "moderate" factions in the civil war in Syria, against the regime of Bashar al_Assad in the hope of installing a more pro western administration in Damascus, the efforts of Washington and London, are in fact assisting the Isis/Sunni campaign in Iraq, against Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki and his ruling clique of Shia dominated government.The sending of hundreds of American "advisers" can only delay the inevitable break up of Iraq (unless of course hundreds of advisers becomes thousands of troops with full scale intervention) and a redefinition of regional borders affecting eventually, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia.
Thus it is when grubby politicians cobble together a secret agreement to carve up an area and share the spoils, taking no consideration of ethnic, tribal, geographical and perhaps most importantly religious differences of the area and drawing straight lines in the sand to create artificial borders between the new "states" and eventually installing their own choice of "governments" to run the new countries. The "Sykes-Picot" agreement of 1916 is being systematically destroyed and there is little that "the West" can do about it.

Sir Mark Sykes, left, and François Georges-Picot, right



Over the past few months, there has been an almost constant barrage of propaganda emphasising "the threat" to the entire region by one group or another involved in the Syrian civil war, and the "threat" of "jihadist extremists" returning to the United Kingdom to bring terror to the streets of our cities (it has not gone unnoticed that the infinitely greater threat of the IRA during "the troubles" of the 70's and 80's did not generate anywhere near the hysterical rhetoric of today's media and politicians). The Syrian civil war has now spilled over the borders into neighbouring countries, and will no doubt, spread into other areas around the region. The western allies have created a labyrinthine mess of competing factions, disputes and internecine fighting in a vain attempt to control what has become an intractable situation and maintain their influence in the whole region.
The 1916  "Sykes-Picot" agreement is in terminal decline, and with its demise, the chickens of the Middle East, are coming home to roost.  



   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe...

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...