Skip to main content

Theresa May places Party before Country

Theresa May to ask for three-month Brexit delay.


Related image
Only a three month extension?
In a statement from number 10 prior to her departure to Europe for her meeting with EU leaders  the Prime Minister Theresa May, confirmed that she will not be asking for a long extension and went on to state that "There is a case for giving Parliament a bit more time to agree a way forward, but the people of this country have been waiting nearly three years now.They are fed up with Parliament's failure to take a decision and the PM shares their frustration". 
The interesting part of this statement and the completely hypocritical part is the suggestion that Theresa May shares the frustration of the British people in being fed up with Parliaments failure to take a decision on Brexit. The fact of the matter is that Parliament has delayed matters for almost three years yes, but over the past eighteen months, the one and only motive driving the Prime Ministers maniacal insistence on presenting the same motion for Parliament to consider has been the overwhelming necessity to maintain unity within the cabinet and the Conservative party in the country. Any suggestion that she acts in the "national interest" falls into meaningless hypocritical rhetoric when we consider that any alternative would undoubtedly result in the complete disintegration of the Conservative party, fragmenting into numerous factions and consigning the Tory party to political oblivion.
The Prime Minister has repeatedly used the "deadline date" as some sort of cudgel, with which to batter the Commons into submission and agree a "deal", proposed not in the "National Interest", but in the interest of Conservative party unity. A subterfuge which fools nobody, but reinforces the belief that the PM  has nothing but contempt for Parliamentary democracy generally and the British people in particular. The arrogance of this Prime Minister extends to new dimensions when she reveals the intention to return to the Commons next week with yet a third iteration of the "deal", thus seeking to over rule the Speakers ruling and place herself with what remains of her splintered support, as the sole arbiter of what the country must do in order to implement Brexit.
Related image
A splintered cabinet
Yes the people of this country "are fed up with Parliament's failure to take a decision", but they are even more fed up with Prime Minster May's arrogance and hypocrisy in refusal to act in the National Interest and continued insistence in placing party first and foremost to the total exclusion of what is right.
This country needs a general election and needs one now. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...