Skip to main content

Deputy Leader pours more oil on the fire.






https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/aug/04/tom-watson-labour-antisemitism-eternal-shame


Deputy leader Tom Watson demands immediate action to halt damaging arguments within the party.

Related image

  
Within hours of Jeremy Corbyn writing in the Guardian that Labour has a problem over the issue of antisemitism within the party, but strongly rejecting the idea that it poses any threat to the Jewish community in the UK, Tom Watson the Deputy Labour leader, wades in with contribution to the continuing "antisemitism" controversey. Watson, another Friend of Israel, calls for 
Corbyn to immediately adopt the full International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism and further, to drop internal inquiries into two Labour MPs – Margaret Hodge and Ian Austin, two more associated with the Friends of Israel group.

The are many reasons for the Labour party National Executive to adopt Antisemitism Guidelines which are different from those in the IHRA "Working Definition".  Notwithstanding that a group of Jewish writers, individuals and some Jewish organisations consider the IHRA definition, to be " verbose and imprecise", or  "poorly drafted, misleading, and in practise  leading to the suppression of legitimate debate and freedom of expression", Watson joins the demands from a number of groups and individuals, many of whom are known to be critical of the Labour party and its leadership, in the calls for an uncondtional acceptance of the IHRA definitions. Watson himself has been a frequent critic of Jeremy Corbyn and has encouraged Corbyn to stand down on a number of occasions, particularly during the "No confidence motion" debate in 2016. We may only speculate as to the motive of Watson for his less than helpful intervention at this time. He is clearly not an ally of the leadership and has frequently been out of step during his period of Deputy Leader.
It is interesting to note that following my criticism of the media generally and Sky News in particular, the ownership and editorial board of this channel chose this Tom Watson article to lead the Sky Newspaper Preview section last night to unleash the venom and anti Corbyn hysteria of their reviwers Christina Patterson and Bobby Friedman.

Related imageImage result for bobby friedman


 I maintain that Sky and the other media outlets, choose their reviwers and those people selected for live interview, from known anti Labour sources and those opposed to Jeremy Corbyn. Last night was no exception, with Patterson particularly being the most vitriolic in her condemnation of "antisemitism" in the party being orchestrated and encouraged by Corbyn. I recall a remark of hers made during the Labour leadership election which summed up her spite with the words "I would rather vote for a jam jar than vote for Corbyn".
This pair of "reviewers", spent the best part of twenty minutes competing with each other to be the one to score the most points with Patterson, after calling for Jeremy Corbyn to be removed from the leadership, emerging as winner by a small margin, with the comment that "Corbyn is a Stalinist antisemite".
The hostility, prejudice and personal abuse pouring out of these reviewers, particularly Patterson, was outrageous and an insult to balanced journalism. However, in these times of seeking to remove Corbyn and also to appease those who would have any criticism of the Israeli government condemned as antisemitism, balanced journalism is just a fading memory from bygone days.
In this respect, Watson's contribution has done nothing to subdue the present turmoil within the party and has in fact thrown petrol into the fire. We can only speculate on his motives for this intervention.






 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe

The Parliamentary Labour Party conspirators are hatching another coup.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/corbyn-labour-leadership-rebel-mps-a7202641.html Labour MPs plan for Corbyn victory  and plot how to confront an emboldened leader Even for the "Independent", the number and use of unnamed anonymous "sources" in this article is quite astonishing. However, amongst all the usual speculative delusion, there is one factor which causes concern to anyone who believes in the Labour Party, its principles and in he democratic process of the Labour movement. It is abundantly clear that elements within the Parliamentary Labour Party, are even now, planning another coup in the event that Jeremy Corbyn should emerge as winner in the current ballot. The failed coup of earlier this year, has now descended into a sham leadership election, because the conspirators still fail to accept the democratic decision of the Labour party membership and cling to

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t