Skip to main content

Deputy Leader pours more oil on the fire.






https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/aug/04/tom-watson-labour-antisemitism-eternal-shame


Deputy leader Tom Watson demands immediate action to halt damaging arguments within the party.

Related image

  
Within hours of Jeremy Corbyn writing in the Guardian that Labour has a problem over the issue of antisemitism within the party, but strongly rejecting the idea that it poses any threat to the Jewish community in the UK, Tom Watson the Deputy Labour leader, wades in with contribution to the continuing "antisemitism" controversey. Watson, another Friend of Israel, calls for 
Corbyn to immediately adopt the full International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism and further, to drop internal inquiries into two Labour MPs – Margaret Hodge and Ian Austin, two more associated with the Friends of Israel group.

The are many reasons for the Labour party National Executive to adopt Antisemitism Guidelines which are different from those in the IHRA "Working Definition".  Notwithstanding that a group of Jewish writers, individuals and some Jewish organisations consider the IHRA definition, to be " verbose and imprecise", or  "poorly drafted, misleading, and in practise  leading to the suppression of legitimate debate and freedom of expression", Watson joins the demands from a number of groups and individuals, many of whom are known to be critical of the Labour party and its leadership, in the calls for an uncondtional acceptance of the IHRA definitions. Watson himself has been a frequent critic of Jeremy Corbyn and has encouraged Corbyn to stand down on a number of occasions, particularly during the "No confidence motion" debate in 2016. We may only speculate as to the motive of Watson for his less than helpful intervention at this time. He is clearly not an ally of the leadership and has frequently been out of step during his period of Deputy Leader.
It is interesting to note that following my criticism of the media generally and Sky News in particular, the ownership and editorial board of this channel chose this Tom Watson article to lead the Sky Newspaper Preview section last night to unleash the venom and anti Corbyn hysteria of their reviwers Christina Patterson and Bobby Friedman.

Related imageImage result for bobby friedman


 I maintain that Sky and the other media outlets, choose their reviwers and those people selected for live interview, from known anti Labour sources and those opposed to Jeremy Corbyn. Last night was no exception, with Patterson particularly being the most vitriolic in her condemnation of "antisemitism" in the party being orchestrated and encouraged by Corbyn. I recall a remark of hers made during the Labour leadership election which summed up her spite with the words "I would rather vote for a jam jar than vote for Corbyn".
This pair of "reviewers", spent the best part of twenty minutes competing with each other to be the one to score the most points with Patterson, after calling for Jeremy Corbyn to be removed from the leadership, emerging as winner by a small margin, with the comment that "Corbyn is a Stalinist antisemite".
The hostility, prejudice and personal abuse pouring out of these reviewers, particularly Patterson, was outrageous and an insult to balanced journalism. However, in these times of seeking to remove Corbyn and also to appease those who would have any criticism of the Israeli government condemned as antisemitism, balanced journalism is just a fading memory from bygone days.
In this respect, Watson's contribution has done nothing to subdue the present turmoil within the party and has in fact thrown petrol into the fire. We can only speculate on his motives for this intervention.






 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...