Skip to main content

Hundreds of businesses bankrupt and thousands of people out of work is a "price worth paying" for Brexit. Says Jeremy Hunt.

Image result for would tell bankrupt firms their sacrifice was worth it


As many people reading this post will already know, I voted to leave at the referendum. What I did not do, was vote to leave at any price. Over recent months, I have shifted to the view that we actually have no reasonable option, other than to remain as part of the EU, albeit that the EU is in need of radical reform and we should be part of that reform process. The question of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland is insoluble if we leave the European Union and to leave without a "deal" the so called "Hard Brexit" would devastate industry and jobs in this country for decades to come. The loss of working peoples rights, the free movement of labour and the access to the free market economy of the EU or even the loss of rights for EU citizens living in this country is not a price that any right thinking person would even contemplate.
It is therefore staggering that one of the Conservative party leadership candidates should state that he would willingly "tell people whose companies went bust after a no-deal Brexit that their sacrifice had been necessary." Jeremy Hunt would see hundreds of businesses go to the wall with hundreds if not thousand of people thrown onto the scrap heap of unemployment, and dismiss their hardships as a "price worth paying".

Related image

Although Boris Johnson has not, thus far, used the same phraseology as Hunt, it is clear from his previous mutterings on the question of Brexit that he holds very similar views. Both candidates therefore, and the only choices on the ballot paper, are prepared to see this country reduced to second class status with high unemployment and many firms out of business. Due to the vagaries of the British political system, 100,000 Conservative party members will take a decision that will effect the lives of everyone in this country, for perhaps decades to come.
Both candidates are committed to a hard Brexit on October 31st and one of them will be the new Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He will be totally lacking in any legitimacy having not presented himself to the 46.8 million people at a general election. Prime Minister he may well be called, but not in my name.
It therefore is essential that the Labour party distance itself from this insanity and provide those who have always been in the remain camp, plus those who voted leave at the referendum but are now be faced with the reality of becoming redundant in this madcap world of Johnson or Hunt, with the clear alternative that as a "Soft Brexit" now appears to be extinct, we must press for a peoples vote or even revocation of Article 50 and finally end the lunacy that Hunt and Johnson are determined to inflict upon us. We must also press for a General election to change the mathematics of the House of Commons to end the perils that these two deranged maniacs seem determined to plunge us into.
We must change the mathematics as we must change the government and install a Labour government for the many not for the few.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe