The coalition of reactionaries must not be allowed to win

 https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jul/19/jewish-leaders-accuse-labour-of-letting-off-antisemites

Jewish leaders accuse Labour of 'letting off' antisemites

We must not allow the coalition of  reactionaries who are now hammering the anti Corbyn anti Labour party message, to prevail over the vast majority of Labour party members. From the House of Lords, through the  Board of Deputies of British Jews, the Jewish Leadership Council, the Jewish Labour Movement, and other outside pressure groups, certain members of the Parliamentary Labour Party and individual within the party generally, orchestrated and encouraged by the media with Sky News and BBC at the front, these forces are all shouting the same message that Corbyn must go and that the Labour party must change course.

We must fightback. They must not be allowed to win.Having at last found their most effective means of criticism and after many attempts to overthrow the leadership with other tactics, the  revisionist forces now push for change with votes of No Confidence from the Lords, with Hain, Mandelson, McNicol and Winston in the forefront, advertisements in the Guardian, open letters to the Labour party with Panorama and Sky News relishing every sordid development.Science tells us that it is not possible to prove a negative, thus, no matter what statements the party or its leader may issue on how they are dealing with this "problem" and what measures they may be taking to resolve the issue, it will never be enough. Therein lies the issue. It is not antisemitism that is at the crux of this argument. it is the ongoing attempts to bring about regime change in the Labour party. These reactionaries are prepared to accept a massive reduction in party membership to achieve their own ends, which will be the inevitable result should they be successful. Gloria De Piero this day announced that she is standing down from the front bench position of shadow justice minister, on the grounds of "the party’s “lack of tolerance". A euphemism for having an opinion that does not agree with hers.Like the rest of the reactionary groups and individuals pushing the "antisemitism" line, these people cannot even be honest about their motivations and agendas for the criticisms.They must not be allowed to win.

Comments

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria. This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a baby. How will the royal baby look as he grows up? Now the latest absurdity, this time f

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California. Unless they are actually doing some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe

Agenda 2019

Search This Blog