The "antisemitic" smear does not work with me

"Who would benefit from a war with Iran?" Part two

I have received a significant number of responses and "likes" to my post "Who would benefit from a war with Iran?" The vast amount of responses are in agreement with what I wrote, but one (which I now cannot find. perhaps it has been deleted by its author),challenged me about lack of proof of Mossad finger prints, yet at the same time accepted the American, United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia allegations as fact without one shred of evidence. He then went on to accuse me of being antisemitic, which he says is typical of the Labour party at this time. Well Mr whoever you are, you may be prepared to accept anything that the Americans or our own government say as gospel truth, but in view of previous evidence I am not. If you consider that my original post is antisemitic, then you are part of the warped bandwagon trundling around at this time who believe that you and those like you are somehow able to throw out the"antisemitism" smear at all who dare to have an opinion differing from your own and yet remain immune from any response. That might well have been the case until recently, but times have changed.The "antisemitism" tactic to undermine Labour party members or the party and its leadership has failed and you will learn (if you are wise) that we will not be bullied or intimidated or silenced by your personal and nasty smears.I stand by what I wrote previously and maintain that there is as much evidence of Mossad finger prints as there is of Iranian involvement.