Skip to main content

It seems that we shall have yet another "Coronation"

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/may/16/may-averts-tory-mutiny-by-agreeing-to-set-her-exit-date-after-brexit-bill-vote

May agrees to set her exit date

Related image

Well, she has finally decided to set a date for her departure from Number 10. Or has she? The Prime Minister who has more political lives than a cat, has agreed to set a timetable for her departure as prime minister in the first week of June. Personally, I will believe it when she climbs into the back of the limo and disappears out of Downing Street and into oblivion. 
In the meantime however, the runners and riders are circling behind the starting line waiting for the man to wave the flag or raise the tape or whatever they do to start the hustings. In Great Britain, we do not elect a Prime Minister. We just vote for the party of our choice and get a Prime Minister by default who just happens to be the leader of the party gaining the most seats at the election. However, the leader of a party will have an effect on the way in which the electorate cast their votes and the personality or political position of he or she, will influence the final make up of the Commons. That is where a problem arises when the leader of a party decides to stand down when holding the office of PM and the next leader of that party automatically becomes our prime Minister. The so called "Coronation" has now taken place with Brown, May herself and will also occur with whoever the Conservative party members choose as their next leader. It is wrong and completely unacceptable that an electorate of around 45 million in this country can have a Prime Minister inflicted upon them according to the whims and vagaries of perhaps only 100, 000 people who happen to be the members of a political party that just happens to be forming a government at that time.The only way which is fair and equitable would be to have a general election should a party change its leader during the time that he or she is Prime Minister. Thus is the case when (if) Prime Minister May actually stands down. The country did not choose her as PM nor will they have any say should Johnson, or Hunt, or Mcvey, or Gove, or Raab or any of the other numerous hopefuls who have so far thrown their hats into the ring, become the next PM with yet another"coronation". Such is the attraction of the post with all its privileges and perks that the next person to be elected is hardly likely to call a general election. The electorate will just have to grin and bear it no matter which person the Conservatives choose albeit that General Election is what the circumstances and the nation may demand.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enough of this hysterical nonsense

  http://style.uk.msn.com/royal-baby/how-will-the-royal-baby-look-as-he-grows-up Media generated hysteria.                           This is too much. For the last 36 hours (thought it seems more like 36 days) there has been wall to wall news coverage, media and television comment and reporting, with Sky News taking first prize for frenzied minute by minute reporting from the Palace, the hospital, from a village somewhere in England, from the studio and anywhere else that Burley, Botting and company could stick a microphone into some obscure "celebrity's" face and ask for yet another banal quote. All this galvanising the mass hysteria of some elements of the public, (who the media would have you believe is the reaction of "the whole world",) with their flag waving, dancing, singing and cheering over what is after all, no more than a woman having a bab...

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t...

A perverse and rather sinister media obsession to discredit, smear and undermine Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/venezuela-jeremy-corbyn-blasted-for-not-condemning-president-maduro-a3606156.html#commentsDiv Venezuela: Jeremy Corbyn blasted for not condemning socialist President Nicolas Maduro as violent conflict escalates There is a perverse and rather sinister obsesseion with the media and particularly television "interveiwers", in seeking to secure from Jeremy Corbyn a "condemnation" of some person or organisation or event. This time it is connected with events in Venezuela and the actions of President Nicolas Maduro and the bloody crackdown on protests against the result of last weeks poll which inaugurated a constituent assembly . The media "stories" and the interrogation by the television interviewers, are as subtle as a sledgehammer being nothing more than a variation on the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" question, which so many repoters use in order for them to make themselves appear very ...