Brexit talks collapse bring Britain closer to no deal exit from EU says Stephen Kinnock
Kinnock seems to have jumped to the wrong conclusion for all the wrong reasons. To argue that we should have agreed the "May deal" and then go on to suggest that we will, "crash out of the EU on October 31st with no deal", ignores the reality of what is actually taking place in the political arena at this time. Yes, the Brexit Party (hard Brexit) may do well in the European elections next Thursday, but then the Libdems (Remain or even revoke Article 50) are predicted to do well at the Ballot box too. Where then does this leave the Labour party?
The Commons have already ruled out the idea of "no deal" but Kinnock, who still seems to harbour leadership ambitions, ignores Labour party policy to advocate a route which would embarrass the party leadership. It is not and never has been, a choice between the Theresa May "deal" or "hard Brexit". If or when the Conservative party leadership election actually takes place, the new leader and therefore Prime Minister, will most certainly be a "hard Brexiteer" and then could tear up any agreement which May might have concluded. The solution to this seemingly insoluble problem (regardless of what Kinnock may argue) could be for the Labour party to adopt a position which either promotes a "Soft Brexit" with a second referendum or revokes Article 50 entirely, which would allow a general election with the new Government being able to sort out the mess that the present government have created over the last three years. To suggest that the choice is either the "Theresa May deal" or a "Hard Brexit on October 31st" is wrong and could even be argued as mischievous.
Comments
Post a Comment